Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Some people feel that the payment for historical and cultural monuments should be more expensive for foreign visitors than local people. Although this approach has some negatives , I believe that it can enable countries to make more income and improve other fields.
There are two chief reasons why foreign visitors should pay more for attractions. The first reason has to do with improved economy. When visitors travel around the world, they tend spend huge amount of money on places of entertainment, thus benefiting countries’ budget through taxes. If the government increase the cost of access to historical and cultural places for visitors from overseas, it may lead to strong economy and development of countries. Another glaring advantage of this approach is that in can cause to strengthen other fields such as education, healthcare, and arts. In other words, having increased costs for foreign travelers, the cost country can invest in improving population lifestyle through this money.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
