Risk culture
292
TAbLE
24.2
Implementation barriers and actions
barrier
action
Lack
of understanding of risk
management and belief that it will
suppress entrepreneurship
Establish a shared understanding,
common expectations and a consistent
language of risk in the organization
Lack
of support and commitment
from senior management
Identify a sponsor on the main board of
the organization and confirm shared and
common priorities
Seen as just another initiative,
so
relevance and importance
not accepted
Agree a strategy that sets out the
anticipated outcomes and confirms
the benchmarks for anticipated benefits
Benefits not perceived as being
significant
Complete a realistic
analysis of what can
be achieved and the impact on the mission
of the organization
Not seen as a core part of business
activity and too time-consuming
Align effort with core processes and
achievement
of the mission of
the organization
Approach too complicated and
over-analytical (risk overkill)
Establish appropriate level of sophistication
for risk management framework and
undertaking risk assessments
Responsibilities
unclear and need for
external consultants unclear
Establish agreed risk architecture with
clear roles and accepted risk
responsibilities
Risks separated from where they
arose and should be managed
Include risk management
in job descriptions
to ensure that risks are managed within
the context that gave rise to them
Risk management seen as a static
activity not appropriate for a dynamic
organization
Align risk management effort with the
mission of
the organization and with
the business decision-making activities
Risk management too expansive and
seeking to take over all aspects of
the company
Be realistic: do not claim that
all the
business activities
within the organization
are risk management by another name