Gender and discourse
Download 22,18 Kb.
|
gender and discourse
The "dynamic" or "social constructionist" approach
The "dynamic" or "social constructionist" approach is, as Coates describes, the most current approach to language and gender. Instead of speech falling into a natural gendered category, the dynamic nature and multiple factors of an interaction help a socially appropriate gendered construct. As such, West and Zimmerman describe these constructs as "doing gender" instead of the speech itself necessarily being classified in a particular category. This is to say that these social constructs, while affiliated [əˈfɪlɪeɪtɪd] with particular genders, can be utilized by speakers as they see fit. The study of genderlect and differences between men’s and women’s language have been one of the hot debates for many scholars. Several researchers using psychological and sociological findings and believes proposed quite intense claims on women’s language such as Trudgill /ˈtrʌdɡɪl/; (1972), Lakoff (1973), Bradley (1981), etc. Women have been considered as irrational, [ɪˈræʃnəl] emotional and subordinate gender compare to men, who are reckless, confident and dominant in either social or psychological domains. Meanwhile some studies like Brown (1980) explained the phenomenon differently and criticized the previous claims and social labels. According to Braun (2004), men:
Danish linguist yens orro herry yespersen Otto Jespirsen (1922) published a set of ideas about women’s language:
Download 22,18 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling