Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates
get better jobs. Others believe there are much wider benefits of
university education for both individuals and society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often argued that tertiary education’s main purpose is to enhance
students’ employment prospects, while others would say that there are
broader advantages to society as a whole. This essay disagrees that the
primary goal of third-level education should be to get learners on the career
ladder and there are far more important perks to consider.
It is clear that a degree does help someone get a better job to a certain extent,
but it by no means guarantees one. Since the financial crisis of 2008 most
graduates find themselves working in jobs that do not require a university
education, such as manual labour or customer service. It is for this reason that
this essay believes that going to university solely to improve your career
opportunities is illogical. The Sunday Times recently reported a survey that
found 67% of graduates in 2010 were working in jobs that required no
qualifications beyond high school.
The real benefits surpass individualistic considerations and help society both
socially and economically. Areas that have world class institutions like San
Francisco and Cambridge consistently rank as having the highest standards of
living on the planet. This essay therefore believes that these factors trump
increased job opportunities as the primary purpose of higher education. For
instance, the area around Stanford University is not only home to Apple,
Facebook and Google, but also world-leading schools, hospitals and civic
facilities.
To conclude, although colleges can lead to increased career prospects, this
should not be considered the be all and end all, and instead we should
consider the socio-economic benefits that make seats of higher learning so
valuable to their communities.
19
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |