Henry Fielding – Tom Jones
Download 0,84 Mb.
|
Nijman-Guilty 2
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT
- Playwright, Student, Journalist, Novelist
- TOM JONES – IN CONTEXT
- Justice, Mercy, and Judgment
- The Reader as Judge
- Character” Evidence
- Barristers, Attorneys, and Petty-foggers
- Deed and Doer
CATHY NIJMAN GUILTY OR NOT GUILTY? HENRY FIELDING’S TOM JONES AND THE LAW LLB (Hons) Research Paper Laws 524 – Lawyers as Writers Faculty of Law Victoria University of Wellington 2007 “[It] is a more useful capacity to be able to foretel the actions of men … from their characters, than to judge their characters from their actions.” – Henry Fielding Tom Jones, Book 3, chapter 1. “[H]e had not divested himself of humanity by being an attorney. Indeed, nothing is more unjust than to carry our prejudices against a profession into private life, and to borrow our idea of a man from our opinion of his calling.” – Henry Fielding Tom Jones, Book 12, chapter 10. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT i
F Magistrate 7
1 (Mis)leading evidence / (mis)leading conclusion 33
1 Witness credibility 37
BIBLIOGRAPHY 59 i ABSTRACTHenry Fielding was a playwright and author before turning to a career in the law at age 30. By the time of Tom Jones’ publication in 1749, Fielding had been deeply involved in the law for 12 years. This paper focuses on the extent to which Fielding’s legal training and his professional experience as a barrister and magistrate are reflected in his portrayal of the law in Tom Jones. The analysis focuses on Fielding’s presentation of the story to the reader, and the way in which he invites the reader to judge events and characters as judges or jurors do in a legal case. The paper identifies the language Fielding uses to establish law as a central theme. Particular attention is paid to how the language reinforces the judicial character of the many “trials” within Tom Jones. The dominant themes of justice, mercy, and judgment are linked to the discussion of the main characters and their actions, and parallels with Fielding’s actions as a magistrate and his extra- judicial writings are drawn. Fielding’s use of the game laws as a metaphor for Squire Western’s views on the relationship between Tom and Sophia informs the discussion of Western’s character; and introduces the contrast between his character and that of Squire Allworthy. Fielding’s use of circumstantial and character evidence is liked to contemporary laws of evidence, and contemporary views of lawyers and the law. The analysis of the character of lawyer Dowling reinforces the importance of considering all available evidence, in context. The discussion of the trifling incident of little Tommy establishes the link between the earlier parts of the paper, this incident, the structure of the novel, and the structure and presentation of a legal case. The paper concludes that there is a direct link between Fielding’s parallel careers as a lawyer and writer, the content and structure of Tom Jones as a legal case, and the reader’s active role as judge (or juror). Word Length: The text of this paper (excluding abstract, table of contents, footnotes, and bibliography) comprises 18,450 words. Key Words: Lawyers as writers Henry Fielding 1707–1754 Tom Jones Law – Great Britain – History – 18th century Authors – English – 18th century
|
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2025
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling