Impurity Photovoltaic Effect in Multijunction Solar Cells


 Effect of Impurity Concentration on Solar Cell Performance


Download 0.73 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet4/6
Sana19.04.2023
Hajmi0.73 Mb.
#1366783
1   2   3   4   5   6
Bog'liq
Impurity Photovoltaic Effect in Multijunction Solar Cells

6. Effect of Impurity Concentration on Solar Cell Performance 
To investigate the performance with variation of impurity concentration, simu lation was done with impu rity in both 
layers of the double junction cell but varying the concentration only in In GaAs since this sub -cell primarily determines 
effects of impurity. Fig. 3 shows V
oc
, J
sc
consistent with those of single junction cell phenomena stated by Karazhanov [7], Keevers and Green [9] and Yuan et al. 
[10]. As shown in Fig. 1, InGaAs sub-cell p-type IPV layer doping was N
a
.
Fro m Fig 3(a), it is evident that J
sc
peaks just as the impurity almost co mpensates this background doping Na and then 
falls drastically. Fig 3(b) shows, V
oc
starts decreasing before this compensation occurs but not so abruptly. Fig 3(c) reveals 
that efficiency is held almost constant up to the point of compensation and then declines very fast. The reason behind this 
phenomenon is attributed to the dependence of minority carrier lifetime on N
t
as shown by Karazhanov [23]: 
 

The three cases of N
t
and N
a
are illustrated as below:
At low trap density, N
t
<< N
a
,
= ,
N
a
. As and N
a
are constant, Karazhanov [23] 
suggests that carrier lifetime becomes approximately independent of N
t
. Hence, J
sc
is almost constant for low N
t
as seen 
from Fig 3(a).
At high trap densities, however, free carriers are captured by the traps. When N
t
= N
a
, all free holes generated from the 
acceptor level N
a
will be captured by the deep donors, resulting in an abrupt decrease of total free carrier density to a 
lower value which is of order of the intrinsic concentration . Hence, 
as given by respectively 
Karazhanov [7] and [23]. From Eq. 7, using a lower value of
, a higher value of carrier lifetime is obtained leading 
to highest J
sc
. This illustrates why J
sc
goes on increasing having a peak value at N
t
= N
a
.
For N
t
>> N
a
i.e. when donor N
t
overcompensates the acceptor N
a
base IPV dopant, the conductivity in base IPV layer 
will be reversed from p type to n type and thus, holes become the minority carriers. Consequently, the free electron 
density will be increased and minority carrier lifetime is calculated for excess carrier 
N
t
, as shown by 
Karazhanov [7]. Hence, carrier lifetime and consequently, J
sc
is drastically reduced with N
t
as predicted from Eq. 7 and 
obtained in Fig 3(a).
On the other hand, Voc abruptly decreases after N
t
= N
a
because of the increase of dark current caused by abrupt 
decrease of majority carrier concentration through compensation by deep -level impurity dopant and the increase of minority 
carrier density as indicated by Karazhanov [7]. Follo wing these phenomena, the efficiency is relatively held constant when 
N
t
<< N
a
because J
sc
is nearly constant although V
oc
has slightly decreased and declines rapid ly after N

= N
a
when both V
oc
and J
sc
sharply 
degrades. 


171
 Md. Shahriar Parvez Khan and Esmat Farzana / Procedia Technology 7 ( 2013 ) 166 – 172 
(a)
(b) 
(c) 
Fig. 3: Variation of cell performance with impurity concentration in terms of- (a) Short circuit current density J
sc
, (b) Open circuit voltage V
oc
, (c) 

Download 0.73 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   2   3   4   5   6




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling