Innovative economics

VII. Criteria for evaluating student knowledge and requirements for obtaining
credits
Theoretical materials related to science are implemented by participating in lectures
and strengthening lectures through the credit-module platform, as well as by answering set
test questions.
The formation and mastery of practical skills in practical training is monitored as a
result of full participation in training and completion of tasks through the module platform.
Assignments on given topics (in tests, essays and other methods) are carried out
through the module platform of independent educational topics.
Science students pass the midterm control in the test method and the final control in
the oral (or test) method.
Student knowledge is assessed based on the “Regulation on the system of monitoring
and evaluating student knowledge in higher education institutions” approved by the order
of the Ministry of Higher and Secondary Special Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan
No. 9-2018 of August 9, 2018.
Students' knowledge is based on the following criteria:
the student makes independent conclusions and decisions, can think creatively, observes
independently, can apply the acquired knowledge in practice, understands the essence of science
(subject), knows, can express, tell, and is considered to have an idea about science (subject) — 5
(excellent) grade;
when the student conducts independent observation, is able to apply the acquired knowledge
in practice, understands the essence of science (topic), knows, can express, tell and has an idea
about science (topic) - 4 (good) grade;

---

12
when the student is able to apply the acquired knowledge in practice, understands, knows,
can express, tell the essence of the science (topic) and has an idea about the science (topic) - 3
(satisfactory) grade;
when it is considered that the student has not mastered the science program, does not
understand the essence of the science (topic) and does not have an idea about the science (topic) -
it is evaluated with a grade of 2 (unsatisfactory).
Conducting the final control type and evaluating the student's knowledge in this type of
control is carried out by a professor who did not conduct the training.