3. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
The behaviour of the steel sheets cut during the tests allows the
results to be divided
into two large groups, i.e. the steel sheets with a thickness of less than 1 mm (ZStE260P
and ZStE260+Z100) and with a thickness greater than 1 mm (DP750,GXE450B and
ZStE260+ZE).
Some differences in the parameters of optimum cuts have been found in each group,
given the fact that the different chemical composition and coating of each sheet
significantly influences the thermal behaviour influenced by
the thickness and thermal
characteristics of the different materials.
3.1.- Steel sheets with a thickness less than 1 mm: ZStE260P and ZStE260+Z100
General consideration, without taking into account yet such exhaustive considerations
as roughness measurements,
rectangularity tolerances, etc., is that similar cutting speed
and power values have been obtained in both sheets. At a constant assisting gas pressure
of 6 bars, taking values –1 and –1.5 mm as focal point positions with respect to the top
surface of ZStE260P and ZStE260+Z100
steels respectively, the optimum working
region for these steel sheets can be observed in figure 3.
Figure 3: Optimum working area for steel sheets thinner than 1
mm
7/15
As can be seen, cutting speeds of over 7,000 mm/min were achieved,
when competitive
laser cuts are more than 3,000 mm/min. As regards cutting quality, figure 4 shows the
kerfs of the different cuts. As was to be expected, the values
are near to the spot size
(0.21 mm).
Spot size
Figure 4: Kerf values at a pressure of 6 bars and -1 focal position
As far as metallurgical analysis is concerned, the edges of the cut are shown in figure 5.
Metallurgical structure corresponds to two cuts in ZstE260+Z100 performed at a cutting
speed of 6000 m/min, 6 bar and –1 mm focal position. In the first one,
beam power
300W has been used whereas in the second one beam power has been 400W. Burr
formation as well as thicker HAZ (40 microns) can be observed in the latter case.
8/15