International Economics
Download 7.1 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
Dominick-Salvatore-International-Economics
Economic Perspectives, Summer 1995, pp. 57–80.
■ G. Burtless, “International Trade and Earnings Inequality,” Journal of Economic Literature, June 1995, pp. 800–816. ■ P. R. Krugman, “Growing World Trade: Causes and Con- sequences,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Macro- economics, No. 1, 1995, pp. 327–377. ■ J. Sachs and H. Shatz, “U.S. Trade with Developing Coun- tries,” American Economic Review , May 1996, pp. 234–239. ■ D. Rodrik, Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1997). ■ M. Slaughter and P. Swagel, “The Effect of Globalization on Wages in the Advanced Economies,” in Staff Studies for the World Economic Outlook (Washington, D.C.: IMF, April 1997). ■ W. Cline, Trade and Income Distribution (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1997). ■ A. Wood, “Globalization and the Rise in Labor Market Inequalities,” The Economic Journal , September 1998, pp. 1463–1481. ■ OECD, Open Markets Matter: The Benefits of Trade and Investment Liberalization (Paris: OECD, April 1998). ■ R. Feenstra and G. H. Hanson, “The Impact of Outsourcing and High-Technology Capital on Wages: Estimates for the U.S., 1979–1990.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 2009, pp. 907–940. ■ P. R. Krugman, “Technology, Trade and Factor Prices,” Jour- nal of International Economics, February 2000, pp. 51–71. ■ R. Z. Lawrence, Blue Collar Blues: Is Trade to Blame for Rising U.S. Income Inequality? (Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2008). ■ P. R. Krugman, “Trade and Wages Reconsidered,” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Spring 2008, pp. 103–137. ■ A. Ebenstein, A., A. Harrison, M. McMillan, and S. Phillips, “Estimating the impact of Trade and Offshoring on Ameri- can Workers Using the Current Population Surveys,” NBER Working Paper No. 15107 , June 2009. ■ A. Harrison, J. McLaren, and M. S. McMillan, “Recent Find- ings on Trade and Inequality,” NBER Working Paper No. 16425 , September 2010. ■ D. Lippoldt, ed., Policy Priorities for International Trade and Jobs (OECD: Paris, 2012). For an excellent theoretical presentation of factor-inten- sity reversal, see: ■ M. Michaely, “Factor Proportions in International Trade: Comment on the State of the Theory,” Kyklos, June 1964, pp. 529–550. The source of the constant elasticity of substitution (CES) produc- tion function used to test for factor-intensity reversal, discussed in Section A5.7, is: ■ K. Arrow, H. B. Chenery, B. Minhas, and R. M. Solow, “Capital–Labor Substitution and Economic Effi- ciency,” Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1961, pp. 228–232. Sources for the empirical studies on factor-intensity reversal dis- cussed in the text are: ■ B. S. Minhas, “The Homophypallagic Production Func- tion, Factor Intensity Reversals and the Heckscher–Ohlin Theorem,” Journal of Political Economy, April 1962, pp. 138–156. Reprinted in J. N. Bhagwati, International Trade: Selected Readings (Baltimore, Md.: Penguin, 1969), pp. 140–168. ■ W. Leontief, “An International Comparison of Factor Costs and Factor Use: A Review Article,” American Economic Review , June 1964, pp. 335–345. ■ D. P. S. Ball, “Factor Intensity Reversals: An International Comparison of Factor Costs and Factor Use,” Journal of Polit- Download 7.1 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling