Supervisory Review
Do analytical procedures
Review working papers
reviewed by an independent member of the audit firm
reviewed for results of audit tests
reviewed for sufficiency of evidence
make a completing-the-engagement checklist
make an unadjusted error worksheet
Evaluate audit findings for material misstatement
sign off completion of steps in audit program
identify monetary misstatements in financial statements
propose adjustments to financial statements
Client approval of adjusting entries
proposed the manager approves adjusting entries
obtain client approval for all proposed adjusting and reclassification journal entries
Review laws and regulations
Evaluate entity’s continuance as a going concern
review of the engagement is performed by a manager or partner not working on the engagement to provide an objective assessment of compliance with firm standards (and SOX where applicable). For auditing firms with multiple offices, it is common practice for review teams to visit the various offices periodically and review selected engagements.
Before signing off on the audit work, the in-charge or senior accountant must make sure that all phases of the work have been concluded in accordance with the audit plan- ning memorandum, that applicable audit procedures have been satisfactorily completed, the audit objectives have been satisfied, that all is done in line with ISAs and that the working papers reflect conclusions supporting the audit opinion. Some audit firms, as we will see in Chapter 13 Overview of a Group Audit, draft an overall memorandum at the conclusion of the engagement commenting on the fairness of the presentation.
ILLUSTRATION 11.11
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |