Leonid Zhmud The Origin of the History of Science in Classical Antiquity
Download 1.41 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
The Origin of the History of Science in
mathemata mathematicis scribuntur. This trait of the Peripatetic
historiography of science is determined, ultimately, by the fact that the concep- tion of exact sciences formed in the Lyceum appeared to be very close to the views of the mathematicians themselves. Since the dependence of histori- ography on the general notions of science is quite obvious, our book also con- siders such problems as the comprehension of science by scientists themselves, notions of boundaries between the exact sciences and natural philosophy, the philosophy and methodology of science in the Academy and the Lyceum, the classification of sciences, etc. Outlining briefly this range of problems, let us touch upon the quite ani- mated discussion several decades ago of whether there was in classical Greece a notion of progress, and specifically of scientific progress, i.e., the idea of a 45 Eudemus understood the history of mathematics as a chain of discoveries that links scientists to each other; cf. “Geschichte einer Wissenschaft ist meines Erachtens: wie ihre Lehren sind entdeckt, bekannt gemacht, bestimmt, berichtiget, dargetan, erläutert, angewandt worden.” (Kästner, A. G. Geschichte der Mathematik seit der Wiederherstellung der Wissenschaften bis an das Ende des 18.Jh.s, Vol.1, Göttingen 1796, 13). 3. Greek notions of science and progress 17 steady growth of knowledge. L. Edelstein demonstrated quite convincingly that classical Antiquity was not unaware of the idea of progress. 46 One should be- ware, however, of taking an idea for an ideology. The popular 19 th -century con- viction that in the future we will experience constant improvement in all spheres of human life is not to be found in Antiquity. The Greek notion of pro- gress was based preeminently, though not exclusively, on achievements in human knowledge and technology and hence proved much more limited than the 19 th -century one. 47 Even granting that some notions of progress current at the time did include the idea of steady social and moral improvement, it was the real achievements of the past and the present, not imaginary future prospects, that the Greeks were concerned with. 48 Such a view, free of the ‘totality’ of the 19 th -century progressivist ideology and its eager anticipation of the future, 49 could comfortably coexist with a cyclic conception of history as, for example, in Aristotle or, later, in Jean Bodin. 50 The limited or, rather, realistic character of the classical idea of progress is due, first of all, to the difference in scale between the actual changes that took place in ancient Greece and in Western Europe respectively in the eighth – fourth centuries BC and in the 15 th –19 th centuries AD. 51 We should keep in mind that the idea of progress made its first appearance only three hundred years after the emergence of writing in Greece and less than one hundred years after the origin of philosophy and science. In Europe, which had infinitely more opportunities to ascertain the steady character of progress, this idea took root only after the French Revolution and the beginning of the Industrial Revol- ution. The limited character of ancient notions of progress underscores their scientific and, in a larger sense, cognitive component, which was not ques- tioned even by those who, on the whole, denied the existence of such notions in classical Greece. 52 Without the idea of the progressive growth of knowledge, the history of science would have hardly come about, and we have abundant evidence that the science of the past and the present was indeed described by the Greeks in the terms of ‘progress’. In the fifth – fourth centuries BC, the idea 46 Edelstein, L. Download 1.41 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling