Международный научно-образовательный электронный журнал «образование и наука в XXI веке». Выпуск №25 (том 7) (апрель, 2022). Дата выхода в свет

Conclusion
The analysis of lexical and phraseological units in three languages allows us to draw the following conclusions. In all three national cultures, beauty is an
intense emotional positive assessment and has a universal purpose to arouse
feelings of joy. Linguistic features of the Uzbek language, that is, stylistic, and
word-forming characteristics contribute to the simplification of the verbalization of the concept of beauty. In English, when connected to the
adjective Beautiful, The answers the question “Who?” And “The Beautiful”
means beautiful people. The peculiarity of the article “the” to turn an adjective
into a noun (transposition) is allomorphic in English. In the Uzbek language, this feature is formed by attaching the ending of the –lar plurality to the adjective: gўzallar (beautiful). The phrase beautiful people means rich, modern and famous representatives of show business. The historical, areal,
ethno-psychological characteristics of peoples provide a national-cultural
picture of the world. The picture of the world is reflected in the value system.
This creates a criterion for actions and priorities as an important component in a system that serves to comprehend reality. In English and Uzbek national
cultures, values are the main components of concepts. This approach has created in world linguistics, a school of analysis of national languages from the point of view of anthropocentricity. Taking into account modern tendencies, the concept of “beauty” is based on three main components-thinking, language, values. Various objects, concepts and phenomena have a certain value in accordance with the General essence and level of need for a human being.

References
1. Alefirenko N.F. Linguoculturology. Value-semantic space of language.
Moscow: Flint, Science, 2010
2. Arutyunova N. D. Metaphor and Discourse // Metaphor Theory: Collection, ed.
N.D. Arutyunova and M.A. Zhurinskaya. –M .: Progress, 1990. –S 5-15.
3. Ashurova D.U. Conceptual metaphor in the literary text // Masalalari
Philology. Tashkent, 2018-No.1, p. 34
4. Humboldt V. von. Selected works on linguistics. - M; 1984. 400 p.
5. Karasik V.I. Cultural dominants in the language // Language personality:
cultural concepts: Sat. scientific tr Volgograd - Arkhangelsk: Change, 1996.
S.3-16.
6. Mamatov A.E. Tilga cognitive endowment can have a named? // o’zbek
tilshunoslining dolzarb muammolari: ilmiy amaliy anjuman materiallari.
Andijon .: 2012.
7. Meshcheryakova Yu.V. The concept of "beauty" in the English and Russian
linguistic cultures. Diss ... Ph.D. Volgograd, 2004 C.23.
8. Nasrullaeva N.Z. Ingliz va o’zbek tillarida olamning phraseologist
manzarasida gender conceptlarning shakllanishi. Phil. doc ... diss. Abstract.
Toshkent, 2018
9. Rickert, G. Values of life and cultural values // EON. Almanac of old and new
culture. Issue 1 - M., 1994. P. 43
10. Rakhmatova M.M. Reflection of aesthetic values in the language: Uzbek
“Go`zal” and English “Beautiful”. //Impact:International journal of research
in Humanities, Arts, and Literature. -2018 Vol.6. Issue 6. India, p 40.
11. Safarov S. Semantics. ”“ Uzbekistan Milly Encyclopedia ”, Toshkent. 2013.b
245.
12. Khusanov B.E. Shahs va ahamiyat munosabatlarida gözallikning namoyön
bўlish hususiyatlari: Diss ... Candidate of Philological Sciences 2004.
54
Dictionaries & Reference
1. Longman Dictionary of Language and Culture. Longman Group, UK, 1992 .--
1528 p.
2. Webster’s New World College Dictionary. 4th edition. - USA, Cleveland:
World Publishing Company, 2001 .-- 1664 p.
List of Accepted Abbreviations
LDLC - Longman Dictionary of Language and Culture
WNWCD - Webster’s New World College Dictionary
ЎTIL – o`zbek tiling isoҳli lugati