Microsoft Word Chapter 1 done doc
Cognition and Regulation of Affective States
Download 0.55 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
Social psychology (1)
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- ‘not to generate counterfactual thoughts’
- ‘ultimatum game’
33
Cognition and Regulation of Affective States : We need to control our emotional reactions in almost all social circumstances. We also need to manage our own negative feelings in order to function effectively. We employ various techniques to do so. One of them is that we engage in behaviors that give pleasure but are potentially unhealthy. We deliberately give in to our temptations in order to lift our mood. Tice and others (2000) have conducted an experiment where they put the participants in good and bad mood. They were provided 15 minutes break to prepare for IQ test. The bad mood subjects procrastinated and their mood has got lifted because of that. Another strategy people use to cope with negative events is ‘not to generate counterfactual thoughts’. So, one thinks that the negative outcome was completely unavoidable. This reduces the negativity of the emotional reaction. 4.4.3 Affect and Cognition: Social Neuroscience Evidence : It was stated earlier that there is an interplay of affect and cognition, essentially they are two separate systems. Several factor analytic studies have clearly demonstrated that cognition and mood are independent dimensions. In addition, the neuroscience research has also confirmed the view that there exist two distinct systems in the brain for these two dimensions. The brain region that is associated with cognition is prefrontal cortex whereas the limbic system is associated with emotions. Some experimental research on game theory highlight this fact. One of the games is ‘ultimatum game’. In this first subject is provided with some money. He had to offer some part of it to other individual, if the other individual agrees, the money is shared, and if the other individual doesn’t agree then no one gets anything. Classic economics theory would predict that the other person would accept any non-zero amount, whereas in reality the offers below 40% are rejected. The MRI studies indicated that when people make such judgments, both, the prefrontal cortex and limbic system were active. In addition, the research on delayed and immediate gratification through rewards also supports this distinction. Increased activity is observed in limbic system for immediate reward than for delayed reward. Download 0.55 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling