Ministry of higher and secondary special education of the republic of uzbekistan kokand state pedagogical institute named after mukimi faculty of foreign languages department of the english language and literature course paper the theme: Types of

14.positive-effective , having a good result
15.Presentation-to show or display your project or assignment
16.Visual aids- video or pictures related to topic which help facilitate understanding
17.Methods-specific way of doing or managing something
18.Effectiveness-having or achieving good result
19.Formation-to make a form of something
20.Principle-The basic idea that plan or system is based on
21.Productive-Effective, producing or achieving a lot
22.Communication- way of changing information or ideas.
23.Theory- basic idea that plan or system is based on
24. Activation-making students to be more active in the class and set of methods for doing this.
25. Structure-the certain pattern of doing or making something.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
1.» Decision PQ-5117 dated May 19, 2021 of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan «On measures to bring the activity of popularizing the study of foreign languages to a qualitatively new level in the Republic of Uzbekistan.
2. Abduazizov A.A. English phonetics. - Tashkent, Musiqa, 3rd revised edition, 2007- 258p.
3. Bothell, T.D. (2001). Brigham Young University. Faculty Center. 14 Rules For Writing Multiple-Choice Questions. Retrieved from: https://testing.byu.edu/handbooks/14%20Rules%20for%20Writing%20MultipleChoice%20Questions.pdf (May 2019)
4. Burton, S.J., Sudweeks, R.R., Merrill, P.F., Wood, B. Brigham Young University Testing Services and the Department of Instructional Science. (1991). How to Prepare Better Multiple-Choice Test Items: Guidelines for University Faculty. Retrieved from https://testing.byu.edu/handbooks/betteritems.pdf (Sept 2019)
5. Clay, B (2001). Is This a Trick Question? A Short Guide to Writing Effective Test Questions. Retrieved from: https://www.k-state.edu/ksde/alp/resources/Handout-Module6.pdf (May 2019).
6. Davis, B. (2009). Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Designing Multiple-Choice Questions. Centre for Teaching Excellence, University of Waterloo. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teachingresources/teaching-tips/developing-assignments/exams/questions-types-characteristicssuggestions (March 2019) Designing Quality Multiple Choice Questions. Yale University, Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning, retrieved from https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/MultipleChoiceQuestions (June 2019)
7. Fozzard, N., Pearson, A., du Toit, E., Naug, H., Wen, W., Peak, I.R. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options. BMC Medical Education. Volume 18, Article number: 252 (2018)
8. Hamilton, L., Halverson, R. Jackson, Ss, Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., & Wayman, J. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067).
9. Jalolov J. J., Makhkamova G.T., Ashurov Sh. S. English language teaching methodology (theory and practice). — Tashkent: UzSWLU, 2014.— 336 р.

11. Jacobson, M. Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary. (n.d.). Multiple Choice Item Construction. Retrieved from https://people.ucalgary.ca/~dmjacobs/portage/index.htm (June 2019)

12. Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing Student Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Three Options Are Optimal for Multiple-Choice Items: A Meta-Analysis of 80 Years of Research, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Volume 24, Number 2, June 2005, pp. 3-13. Retrieved from: https://www.ernweb.com/educational-research-articles/the-optimal-numberof-choices-in-a-multiple-choice-test/ (Sept 2019)
13. Sedita, J (2019). Keys to Beginning Reading. Rowley, MA: Keys to Literacy.
14. Torgesen, J. K. (2006) A comprehensive K-3 reading assessment plan: Guidance for school leaders. Portsmouth, NH. RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction https://www.fcrr.org/assessment/pdf/K-3%20Reading%20assessment.pdf
15. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Internet resources
1.https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-3-3
2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0_7
3.www.wikipedia.com
4.www.researchgate.com
5.www.teachmit.com