Olms interpretative Manual


Download 317.29 Kb.
bet73/116
Sana23.12.2022
Hajmi317.29 Kb.
#1049337
1   ...   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   ...   116
Bog'liq
NA9OKN9N8WdmVPlg861

-- CORRECTINGCORRUPTION


  • -- FINANCIALMALPRACTICE

    *312.005ENDANGERINGFISCALINTEGRITY


    The kind of financial malpractice which may justify imposition of a trusteeship is notspecifically defined in the Act.The conduct which might lead to supervision by a parent bodycould be as serious as embezzlement of funds by local officers.However, it would not appear tobeimproperforalabororganizationtoimposeatrusteeshipwhenactionwhichisnotnecessarilycriminal,likeirresponsible leadership,jeopardizes thefiscalintegrity ofthe organization.




    1. -- ASSURINGPERFORMANCEOFCOLLECTIVE


    BARGAININGAGREEMENT

    313.005WILDCATSTRIKES


    A trusteeship imposed on a local union by an international union where the members of thelocal engaged in a number of wildcat strikes and the officers of the local were irresponsible andincapable of controlling the members was held to be a valid trusteeship within the meaning ofsection 302.


    *313.007FAILURETOENFORCEAGREEMENT


    AnInternationalunionimposedatrusteeshipoveralocalunionwhen itsinvestigationrevealed that the local could not police its collective bargaining agreements, offer adequatemembershiprepresentation inthe field,nor properlyadminister itsdispatchprocedure.


    In a private suit under section 304 challenging the validity of the trusteeship, a FederalDistrictCourtfoundthatunder theabovecircumstancestheInternationalpresidentwasjustifiedinimposing a trusteeship to assure the performance of the union’s collective bargaining agreements.Foosev. Hoffa, 63 LRRM 2436 (C.D. Cal. 1966).


    (TechnicalRevisions: Dec. 2016)




    RESTORINGDEMOCRATICPROCEDURES


    *314.005INABILITYTO CONDUCTORDERLY MEETINGS


    Aninternationalimposed atrusteeshipoveroneofits localsbecausethelocal was“in


    turmoil,”andlocalofficeswereunabletoconductorderlymeetings.Inupholdingthevalidityofthistrusteeship in aproceeding brought undersection 304, aFederal District Court said:

    “Certainly,therewas sufficientjustification forimposing aTrusteeship forthe purposeof


    restoringdemocraticprocedures…therewasnodoubtbutwhatthelocalofficers,…werenotabletoconduct proper parliamentarymeetings.”


    Foosev. Hoffa,63 LRRM2436 (C.D.Cal. 1966).

    (TechnicalRevisions:Dec. 2016)



    Download 317.29 Kb.

    Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
  • 1   ...   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   ...   116




    Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
    ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling