Indirect restorations – further considerations
145
Although the laboratory costs are eliminated, CAD/CAM systems
require a large initial outlay. In addition
the occlusal surface of
restorations is not as accurately produced compared with laboratory
restorations, and some systems require the occlusal surface to be
shaped intra-orally by the operator. A further disadvantage is that
aesthetics are limited because of the small
range of available colours
and monochromacity, as the restoration is machined from a single
block.
LIMITED RESISTANCE AND RETENTION
When a preparation has limited
retentive and resistance form, there
are a number of steps that may be taken to reduce the potential loss of
the restoration. These include limiting influence of lateral forces with
additional preparation features, utilising
adhesive luting cements and
increasing crown height.
Additional preparation features
If a groove is placed into the axial wall(s) of a preparation, this will
reduce the moment arm of the force that acts
to dislodge a restoration
about a point of rotation. Shortening this radius of rotation will
increase the resistance form of a preparation. This effect can be
visualised as a short tapered preparation in which the placement of
a groove results in the restoration ‘engaging’
against a wall of the
preparation at an earlier point, so that a larger portion of the prepara-
tion acts to resist the rotational force. This is shown schematically in
Fig. 6.5. Multiple parallel grooves will significantly
limit the path of
withdrawal and increase both resistance and retention of the final
restoration.
Fig. 6.5
Grooves providing additional resistance form.
POOC06 02/18/2005 04:36PM Page 145