Literature
review.
For
the
emergence
and
development of linguistic pragmatics in the second half of the
20th century, the results of the development of two scientific
directions were of particular importance. Firstly, these were
the ideas of the philosophers and founders of semiotics Morris
and Pierce that the concept of pragmatics can be defined as a
relationship between a sign and its interpreter, that is, the one
who creates (produces) and understands this sign [2].
Secondly, it was the theory of speech acts by J. Austin and J.
Searle, who first defined the utterance as an action and,
accordingly, the process of communication as an active
process of interaction [3]. Until that time, the term
―pragmatics‖ was used both in various fields of science
(primarily in philosophy, sociology and psychology) and in
everyday life, which led to the fact that its content became
largely vague and ambiguous.
It is known from the evolutionary history of
pragmatics as a scientific direction that it can be considered an
integral aspect of numerous fields of science. Depending on
the time period and the authors of a particular theory,
pragmatics can be understood as:
1) one of the three components of semiosis, which
studies the relationship of signs to the subjects who produce
and interpret them [4];
2) the study of patterns, pathologies and paradoxes in
the interaction of individuals [5];
3) the study of language as an instrument of action to
achieve various goals [6];
O„ZBEKISTON MILLIY
UNIVERSITETI
XABARLARI, 2022, [1/6]
ISSN 2181-7324
FILOLOGIYA
https://science.nuu.uz/
Social sciences
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
