Pokonferencyjna
THE PLOT AND ARTISTIC SKILL IN THE STORY OF CHINGIZ
Download 1.75 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
86 05 02 s
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- Abstract
- USED LITERATURE
THE PLOT AND ARTISTIC SKILL IN THE STORY OF CHINGIZ
AYTMATOV Xakimova Farida Ilhom qizi The student of Termez state university Paygamova Aziza The student of Samarkand state institute of foreign languages Ro’ziboyeva Dilfuza The student of Termez Medical college Keywords: “Face to face”, refugee, his mother`s and wife`s fortune, war, main and assistant plot in the story “Face to face”, culmination point. Abstract: the plot of story and the composition analysis, the interpretation of esthetic skill of writer and subject of war and refugee. Аннотация: сюжет и композиционный анализ, интерпретация эстетического мастерства писателя и субъекта войны и беженца. 130 MONOGRAFIA POKONFERENCYJNA writer introduced the period of war to reader.One of the protagonists described Saida`s action before the war however, he or she described her happy life. After that knot (that is event or problem) started. It is clear for us knot is a thing to reason beginning of events and it is the place that existed the conflect of the work. Knot was compassed when Saida was sleeping Is- moil knocked the gate, that is to clear his avoiding from the war. The events of plot were developed step by step.As we look the growth of work events we testify that it is paid attention two things in it: these things are difficul- ties in the families because of war, de- scribing the cruafixions in people and Saida`s life in the threat. It is important the culmination point in every work. Culmination point in the story “Face to face” influenced people`s feelings, reader was believed to hate Is- moil, it is possible war to change the per- son, namely, it believed that it is possible to wrack the feeling which are named mankind as worm.It was caught the read- er below following idea: “it should be dream”. But all of them were true. Ismoil shaped as animal which did not think anything except food. Totioy fed three children barely, and she said that “ if spring comes my cow cubs, there is some milk and also my chil- dren eat a lot”. But Ismoil stole her cow. It was not the portion of three orphans, cow was one deliverance not to be hungry, anymore also it was lost. It was evinced the culmination point when Saida knew that her husband has stollen the cow and has brought the meat of this cow. It was seething two opposite feelings in Saida`s heart: love and justice. Lastly, love lostthe justice, thereafter, Saida dis- covered her husband. It was difficult for her and she knew that her children be- came orphan but even though she did not vouchsafe her child to conscience and creed father. Ismoil`s mother passed away in the story and Ismoil did not go her ceremony. Why, exactly mother image doomed pass- ing away and only her child was staring not pursuing his mother at the end loca- tion. Because mother is one of the most honorable person in the world. Our mother is only one gender who is not changed other person in our life. Her love enters to our heart with mother milk and it is with us until we pass away. Because of this writer chose Ismoil`s mother for death not his wife. In this position he was going to describe that Ismoil became heartless. He indicated to realize this to reader. It is impossible to read this story which is a picture of a mother who left the world without looking freedom at her children giving her love and becoming pale her hair, working hard. Writer did not describe Ismoil as mankurt (not to remember anything). He had the feelings of love. Other wise when his mother was being buried he would not be staring this event “bitting his lip until going out blood”. Ismoil went to his mother`s tomp after people had left the cemetery and no one had stayed. He crawled with lost memory leaning trembling hands,ashe was em- bracing new sail he growled with fuggy sound and he panted from gloom, anger, 131 PHILOLOGY, SOCIOLOGY AND CULTUROLOGY №14 wrath, distress. It was difficult to guess what he shouted as wolf and to curse somebody and something. So he started to shout with loud voice as vinous person: “my mother, mother, sorry! Sorry! Curse me! Curse me at hereafter! Curse the war! Curse the war”. It was denominated Chin- giz Aytmatov`s artistic intent and aim in this position. It is writer`s real skill that describing the war through the image of refugee, to hate oxbow in the war. These words which were disgorging from his heart, actually, belong to whole human- kind. Ismoil was not a person who hated the war, also everybody hated the one. Ismoil would have lived with his family. It was appeared good idea which aimed at Ismoil in this story. It was bad event that he had stolen Totioy`s cow. So everybody hated him. Because of this Saida discov- ered her husband to soldiers.This caused for naming the story “Face to face”. Namely, Ismoil confronted with Saida. Saida became other person, she carried her child, she became pale. But she seemed beautiful. Story ended accordingly. USED LITERATURE 1. Chingiz Aytmatov. Chosen works: Stories. T..”Sharq”, 2016. 2. Karimov S. In the perfect composition// Tongue language and literature.-1991.- N:6.-B54-58 3. Kuronov D. Yuldoshev N. The theory of literature. Methodical manual. Termiz, 2017. |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling