Rabbi yassir wala tu'assir wa tammim bil khair

Rabbi yassir wala tu'assir wa tammim bil khair

The line graph shows information regarding the amount of meat products consumed by a person per week (in grams) in a particular region from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, the proportion of consumption beef and lamb decreased, compared to the chicken, which rose significantly over the period. Nonetheless, the index in the fish remained nearly the same in the given period.
Starting the proportion regarded to chicken which showed a growing trend, reaching just over 220 grams per person per week in 2004 which was the highest figure in the overall graph. In contrast to this, the amount of beef and lamb consumption saw a gradual decline from approximately 210 to 160 and from 150 to around 65 grams respectively.
Turning to the fish consumption, the figure remained almost at the same level between roughly 60 and 50 grams per person per week from 1979 to 2004.


The table gives information regarding expenses of consumers on various goods in percentage in five different nations in a year.
Overall, in 2002, the percentage of food, drinks and tobacco were in the most important position than other items (sections) that people spent money in all of countries. The leisure and education experienced the lowest proportion.
While Turkish and Irish consumers spending on food, drinks and tobacco were near 30%, the very figure for Italy and Spain were under 20%. Moreover, there was the lowest index in Sweden which was just over 15%.
On the other hand, the proportion of Italy consumers on clothing and footwear was 9% when other countries got almost 6%. Turning to leisure and education, Turkey consumers’ expenditure was just over 4% when the proportion of Italy and Sweden were well over 3%. The lowest amount was almost 2% in Ireland and Spain.


The bar chart gives information about the rate of divorces in two different European countries between 2011 and 2015.

Overall, the rate of divorces in Sweden experienced a decline trend, while Finland showed a gradual growth throughout the period. However, the percentage of people who divorced in Finland was at a lower point at the beginning, then it outraced Sweden at the end of the period. 

Starting with the proportion of divorces, the figure in Sweden was at about 44% in the beginning of the given period, being higher than Finland’s rate by 9%. It rose to almost four percent in 2012. Moreover, there was a significant decline in the percentage of divorces in Sweden from 49% to 38% between 2012 and 2015. Then, the very level reached the lowest point at the end of the period.

Turning to Finland, there was a gradual decline trend in the proportion of divorced people from about 38% to 32% a year later. After experiencing a minimal decrease, the same index went up approximately 39% in 2013. After one year, it increased by about 3% percent in 2014, reaching around 42 % and remained steady for the next year outracing the rate of Sweden. 

The bar chart gives information about how many hours people spent on accomplishing house chores in the UK between 1985 and 2005.
Overall, the proportion of unemployed women on doing housework was dominant during the whole given period. However, the proportion of employed men and women who did domestic work showed a minimal rise from 1985 to 2005.
The proportion of women who had no a job spent 7 hours on housework in the beginning of the period and falling around 6.5 hours in 1995. Then, after a decade it returned its previous position. Turning to the women with a part time employment, there was a gradual decline in the trend of doing homework from about 5.5 to 6 hours between 1985 and 1995. After experiencing a minimal drop, the same figure increased to 6 hours at the end of the given period.
The rate of men who got a full time job spent one hour on home work in first decade. However, the same level experienced a gradual rise from 1 hour to about 1.4 hours in the second decade. While, the figure for women who had a full-time work experienced a gradual decrease from 2 to about 1.4 hours between 1985 and 1995. Nevertheless, the same level rose from about 1.4 to 2.8 during the last decade.
The line graph gives information about the regional household recycling rates in the UK, France and Germany from 2005 to 2015.

Overall, the recycling rate of France was higher than the UK and Germany at the beginning of the given period. However, the same country saw a gradual decline, while Germany and the UK’s percentage of recycling showed a rise with sharp fluctuation and outraced France in the end.

The percentage of recycling waste in France was dominant in the first year. Moreover, it dramatically decreased from 50% to 30% from 2005 to 2013. Then, the same figure for France rose by 10% in 2015. Additionally, the proportion of France’s waste was at the lowest point at the end of the given period.

In 2005 the rates of recycling in Germany and the UK were approximately 20% and 35% respectively. The proportion of Germany’s household waste rose dramatically throughout the period, exceeding France’s rate in 2009 and reaching about 56% by the end of the period.

Turning to the UK’s, the percentage of recycled waste increased 40% in 2007 and remained unchanged until 2009. During 2009-2011 it witnessed a sharp growth to more than 50% and reached 60% at the end over the given period.



The chart gives information about changes in average cost of home in five different cities from 1900 and 2002 compared to the same cities prices of houses in 1989.
Overall, the percentage of house prices in all cities showed rise during the given period, except one. However, the percentage of cost of homes in Frankfurt witnessed minimal decline, while the proportion of the house prices in London experienced sharp growth between 1996 and 2002 compared with 1989.
Starting with period from 1990 to 1995 the average prices of houses in three countries went down significantly from -5 percent to about -8 between 1990 and 1995. In contrast to that the proportion of cost of house in Frankfurt and Madrid showed minimal rise from around 1percent to 2 percent during the same given period.
Turning to second period (1996-2002) the chart showed that the average prices of houses in most of cities experienced significant increase only excluding Germany. Despite the proportion of the average cost of houses in Frankfurt declined slightly by 1 percent, the percentage of the average house cost in Madrid, New York and Tokyo went up significantly of the given period. However, the most increase was in the index on prices of houses in London as it dramatically increased by 11 percent from 1996 to 2002.