Rejalar: Transport va aloqa tizimlarini taqqoslash

Shaharda yoki qishloqda yashash yaxshi yoki yo'qligi haqida tez-tez muhokama qilinadi.
Rejalar:
1. Transport va aloqa tizimlarini taqqoslash.
2. Shahar va qishloqlarda aholi va atrof-muhitni taqqoslash.
3. Shaxsiy fikr.
Yangi boshlanuvchilar uchun shahar va qishloq o'rtasida turli xil transport va aloqa tizimlari mavjud. Birinchidan, shaharlarda transport tizimi va aloqa hukumat tomonidan yaxshi tashkil etilgan. Masalan, Toshkentdagi avtobuslar va metro poyezdlari har 10 daqiqada yetib boradi va transport tashkilotlari bu transportni kechikmasligi uchun nazorat qiladi. Biroq, bu tizim qishloqlarda ishlamaydi, chunki avtobus bekatlari va temir yo'l stantsiyalari mavjud emas. Masalan, mahalliy aholi biron bir joyga borish uchun velosiped va o'z transport vositalaridan foydalanadilar va hatto piyoda yurishga majbur bo'lishadi.
Katta shaharlar odamlar bilan gavjum. Masalan, Toshkentda 3 milliondan ortiq aholi istiqomat qiladi va kechqurun va ertalab yo'l harakati bilan bog'liq muammolar yuzaga keladi. Aksariyat avtomobillar gazni yoqilg'i sifatida ishlatishadi, shuning uchun ular havoni ifloslantiradi. Bu ko'plab kasalliklarning sababi bo'lishi mumkin. Boshqa tomondan, qishloqlarda mahalliy aholi daraxtlar va boshqa turdagi o'simliklarni ekishadi, chunki ular pul ishlashadi va bu tabiat uchun ham foydalidir. Natijada, o'simliklar yomon havoni o'zlashtiradi va inson hayoti uchun foydali bo'lgan karbonat angidridni chiqaradi.
Umumiy nuqtai nazardan, qishloqlarga nisbatan shaharlarda yashash uchun bir nechta sabablar mavjud. Ammo odamlar shaharlarda tabiatni himoya qilishlari kerak. Biroq, hukumat qishloqlardagi ob'ektlarni ham rivojlantirishi kerak. Menimcha, bu ikkala joy ham yashash uchun afzalliklarga ega.
It is frequent topic of discussion that is it good to live in city or living in village.

Plans:
1. Comparing transportaion and communication systems.

2. Comparing population and environment in cities and villages.
3. Personal opinion.

To begin with, there are diverse differances of transportation and communication systems between city and countrysides. Firstly, Transport system and communication are well organized in cities by government. For example, buses and underground trains come to every 10 minutes in Tashkent and these transports are controlled to not be late by transport organizations. However, this system are not operated in villages because there is no bus stops ans train stations. For instance, local people use bikes and own cars to get somewhere and even they are obliged to walk.

Big cities are crowded with people. For example, over 3 millions of people live in Tashkent and evenings and mornings there is problem with traffic. The most cars are use gas as fuel therefore, they pollute the air. This may causes of many illnesses. On the other hand, in villages local people plant trees and other species of plants because of they earn money from them and this also is useful for nature. As a result, plants absorb bad air and produce carbon dioxide, which is useful for human life.
From a general view, there are several reasons for living in cities compare with villages. But people should keep nature in cities. However, government should also develop facilities in villages. In my opinion, both of two places have its own benefits to live in.