became the economy candidate, the one who would address that problem. And
despite all the rumors and all the suspicions, despite a controversial wife and a
style that caused many people to mistrust
him and dub him Slick Willy, Clinton
won. Focus won.
Focus. In everything from campaigns for peanuts to campaigns for
president, focus wins.
When the Banker’s Eyes Blurred: Citicorp’s Slip
If innovation drove Citicorp to the top, a lack of focus almost knocked it all the
way back down.
In the 1980s, Citicorp resembled an overpaid
and overpraised athlete who
had read too many press clippings. The company’s enormous success, fueled by
its string of innovations, apparently convinced the people in the corner offices
that Citicorp was above a fundamental principle of marketing: It did not have to
focus. It could reach out everywhere
and dominate the landscape, from high-
volume consumer banking to global merchant banking.
At the same time, however, several banks got the focus religion. Bank of
America left overseas and wholesale branches of banking to focus on becoming
the dominant consumer bank on the West Coast.
Chemical Bank moved out of
international banking to focus on a large available niche: the middle-market and
small-business customer.
Citicorp continued to stumble; it became a case study in stumbling, in loss of
focus, in overreaching.
At
this writing, the company’s survival seems likely, if only because Citicorp
now appears to have a focus: on the low-cost, high-volume niche of consumer
banking. But the company’s rise, stumble, and survival
from its fall suggest this
lesson:
No one—not even the most innovative and remarkable company in its
industry—can be many things to many people.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: