Social cooperation as an objective law in the democratization of society and the implementation of social justice Anarbayev Jaxongir Batir o‘g‘li jdpu. Jizakh. Uzbekistan

Social cooperation as an objective law in the democratization of society and the implementation of social justice
Anarbayev Jaxongir Batir o‘g‘li
JDPU. Jizakh. Uzbekistan

It is known that the society cannot exist without social cooperation, otherwise the opposite relations would prevail, which would eventually lead to public unrest.

Therefore, there is always a need for principles of living that are acceptable to all. One such principle that satisfies everyone is social justice. It is precisely because of justice that a large-scale and solid foundation for social cooperation is created in society. In this sense, it is necessary to analyze the phenomenon of social justice as one of the basic laws of the life of the society, to analyze its directness with the principles of social cooperation and the place of this connection in the sustainable development of the society. We will discuss this issue in detail in this chapter.
What is a just society? If we assume that the process of establishing a civil society based on a legal democratic state and a socially oriented market economy is taking place in our country, do we have the right to demand absolute justice today?
Thanks to independence, we have gained immense opportunities. First of all, as the life of our society gradually became democratized, the possibility of fair order and sustainable development was born. This process covers issues of justice in all spheres of public administration, from politics to spirituality, from wages. At the same time, it is natural that the implementation of social justice takes place in the conditions of freedom, law and democracy in all spheres of society.
The purpose of the policy aimed at the renewal and development of society implemented in our country is to create decent living conditions for all people living in our country. The main goal in this is to ensure a standard of living that is guaranteed at the level of developed democratic countries, first of all, to create a just society with a materially secure, morally strong family. In this sense, social justice has chosen the path of independent and stable development and has accumulated certain experiences along the way. It remains a necessary condition for further development of Uzbekistan. Based on this idea, it is natural that understanding the gradual development of the idea of ​​social justice and its universal nature, its aspects that correspond to the values ​​of social cooperation, is of great importance.
In this sense, it is necessary to pay attention to the views within the framework of some liberal and libertarian concepts that the values of justice and cooperation can meet the requirements of complex social relations in the conditions of the modern market economy or be the opposite of it. Here, let's pay attention to the thoughts of the famous Austrian economist F. Hayek about the idea of social justice.
Hayek thought about the nature and destruction of socialist ideas that were popular in the 19th and 20th centuries.
Hayek, as a prominent thinker of the market order, sometimes goes too far in denying the social ideas of the organization of society. While Hayek dwells on the origin of freedom, property and justice, he wants to prove that private property is the center of moral standards of every developed civilization and that it cannot be separated from individual freedom.
As a supporter of the spontaneous market, Hayek completely denies the conscious organization of society, especially its sphere of distribution. Hayek argues that there is no other optimal factor than the distribution of products through market competition. After that, he tries to destroy the concept of "social justice". He even doubts that the concept of "justice" expresses any situation or has any meaning at all. These ideas of Hayek are connected with the idealization of individualism. The economist stated that "the single desire of everyone cannot determine the well-being of each individual person based on some idea of justice."
As an ideologist of individualism, Hayek was against the concept of "sociality" (sociality) in general, including the idea of social cooperation, mocking the term "sociality", he called this word "the most absurd in all our moral and lexical remains an expression" he writes. Hayek even deliberately wrote down all the combinations in which the word "social" was used for some time, and as a result, a list of 160 words defined by the word "social" was created. In this, Hayek focuses all his efforts against the concept of "Social Justice" and the concepts related to it, because these concepts, in his opinion, played a major role in the foundation of socialism.
In our opinion, Hayek makes two mistakes in these cases. First of all, he equates the concepts of "social justice" and "social cooperation" with full moral norms without covering the existing foundations. Secondly, Hayek considers these concepts to belong to the values of total socialism. In fact, these concepts are universal human values. They do not lose their relevance even in the system of market relations. One side of Hayek's doctrine, aimed at the gross denial of social justice and cooperation in the conditions of the market economy and the social organization of modern society, is that he believes that the mechanism of unconscious economic distribution that occurs through the market cannot be evaluated as fair or unfair. However, Hayek disparagingly assesses people's attention to the concepts of "justice", "equality", and "cooperation" as a "disorder in the minds of people". Considering the capitalist system based on the free market as the last word of human development, Hayek unilaterally evaluates all forms of random distribution in the market as fair.
It seems that Hayek had forgotten the views of the scientists who sharply criticized the market element, the pursuit of profit, selfishness and individualism in the capitalist society that he lived and created before him. In the works of many classic sociologists, including Zombart's "Modern Capitalism", Max Weber's "Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism", O. Spengler's "Fading of the European Sun", M. Horkheimer and T. Adorno's "Dialectic of Enlightenment", In G. Simmel's "Philosophy of Money" the concept of "spirit of capitalism" is deeply analyzed. In such works, the spirit of consumerism is severely criticized. In fact, this problem remains especially urgent during the current global globalization process and the ongoing economic and financial crisis around the world. In particular, there are frequent protests against excessive consumerism and unequal distribution of material goods among people in the developed countries of the world. In several countries of the world, mass protests are taking place against advertisements that promote greed, products that are advertised more than necessary and forced to be consumed.
So, in the liberal imagination, justice is often evaluated as a coordinating value of freedom and equality. But the question of how to achieve such compatibility remains open. In the social-democratic concepts of the teachings of other directions, social cooperation is evaluated as a coordinating value. According to the social democratic concept, cooperation will be more effective than equality only when three values - freedom, justice and solidarity - are aligned. In particular, the famous German sociologist M. Horkheimer described the conflict between equality and freedom as follows: "Freedom, equality, fraternity are wonderful things. But if you want to preserve equality, you have to limit freedom, if you want to give people freedom, then equality is unthinkable."
In general, historically, social-democratic concepts have developed in connection with the ideas of building a democratic society. Naturally, social justice is also part of the "core values" of modern social democracy. Currently, it is included in the program of the largest social-democratic parties operating in Germany, Austria, Sweden, Norway, Holland, Italy, Luxembourg, Denmark and Spain as a "leading goal and value". In them, social cooperation is evaluated as the scope and measure of reforming the existing system.
At the same time, the principle of solidarity and cooperation in social democracy is understood as "being ready to subordinate one's abilities and opportunities to the common welfare." The rule of solidarity requires programs such as the social security system and the redistribution of the population's income, which cannot be implemented without the power of the government. In this sense, it is considered that "justice and freedom can be achieved step by step only with the help of political power".
Social-democracy is gaining the trust of the masses of workers by constantly calling for reforms. In particular, the attempt to reform the existing system is its undoubted positive feature. B. Kraisky, one of the figures of social democracy, supports this rational way and emphasizes that any class conflicts, especially revolutions, lead to disorder, violence and even more social injustices. The most important is the path of reforms, which is based on the principle of "justice for all" and in this sense envisages social cooperation.
So, now the problems of social justice are interpreted as being inextricably linked with human rights, ideas of democracy, and the tasks of ensuring social cooperation in society. This issue occupies an important place in documents related to the field of international law. For example, in the definition of the concept of "social justice" in the UN documents, it is necessary to satisfy the vital needs of a person, fair distribution of material resources, especially while ensuring general access to important values such as health care and education, creating equal opportunities in society, the disadvantaged attention is being paid to the protection of individuals, establishment of balance in areas such as consumption, income generation, and provision of social cooperation.
As we have seen above, social justice is highly valued as a vital value that ensures cooperation in society. For societies that are on the path of independent and sustainable development, it has two valuable contributions. This is why the first President Islam Karimov pays attention to the principles of social justice and fairness at the level of state policy in the process of building a democratic society based on national and universal values. After all, the establishment of a free and prosperous society in our country is the goal, the implemented reforms are the means, and the socio-political stability prevailing in our society is, in turn, a condition for reforms. All this depends on how well social justice is implemented in the life of our society, because without justice, social and political stability will not be achieved. This word, in turn, does not mean social cooperation.


Key words: Society, Social cooperation, social justice, democratization, Individualism, freedom, equality, social democracy, international law.


List of literature

1. 
   Fridrix Avgust fon Xayek. Пагубная самонадеянность. Ошибки социализмаю 1992.
   
2. 
   Kandaurova L.A Критика буржуазных теорий социалной справедливости// Общественный прогресс и современность. –Казан.: Изд-во Казаню ун-та, 1998
   
3. 
   Права человека и работа в социальной сфере// Центр по правам человека ООН.-Нью-Йорк и Женева, 1995