Statistical, Ecosystems and Competitiveness Analysis of the Media and Content Industries: The Newspaper Publishing Industry
Paying for online and mobile news offerings
Download 1.37 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
newspaper publishing industry jrc69881
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- The Newspaper Publishing Industry 65
3.3.2
Paying for online and mobile news offerings Due to the abundance of news and information available online people have so far showed little willingness to pay for online news. Early efforts to have people pay for online news articles or archive services have largely failed, with some notable exceptions for specialised and niche content. For instance the Financial Times is one of the few online newspapers which has succeeded in developing a profitable online service. Currently, visitors who register can view up to ten articles for free and are subsequently invited to pay for the newspaper’s online content, if they want to read more than just the headlines. Despite early failures, the search for feasible and viable pay models continues. At the end of 2010 and the beginning of 2011, several news publishers relaunched paywalls and The Newspaper Publishing Industry 65 subscription plans to their websites (WAN IFRA, 2011). 28 At the beginning of 2011 the New York Times, for instance, introduced a digital subscription plan. Readers who visit the New York Times website are allowed to access twenty articles per calendar month for free. To gain access to more online content and to receive the New York Times mobile app, people need to pay a fee. Subscription plans start at 3.75 USD a week. 29 The New York Times estimated that approximately 15% of its visitors would run into their paywall. In Europe, newspapers also have launched paywalls. Examples are The Berliner Morgenpost, the Hamburger Abendblatt and Le Figaro (Foremski, 2010; Lunden, 2010) as well as Murdoch’s News International UK titles The Sun, News of the World, The Times and the Sunday Times (Lloyd, 2010). Early figures on the amount of online subscribers are modestly positive for the New York Times but less so for other newspapers that have introduced paywalls. Digital subscriptions to the nytimes.com went up from zero to 224,000 customers in three months; 57,000 iPad and Kindle users joined and 750,000 print subscribers registered for online access (Preston, 2011). At the same time, and contrary to expectations, advertising revenues rose as well. Figures for the online edition of the Times in the UK are however, much less positive (Preston, 2011). The introduction of tablet computers such as the iPad (in 2010) brought new promises for paid newspaper services. In 2011, News Corp. launched an iPad-only newspaper; The Daily. There are also examples of newspaper publishers offering a combination of a print subscription and a digital iPad version of the newspaper for reduced prices for use in households where more than one person wants to read the newspaper (e.g. NRC Handelsblad, a Dutch quality newspaper). Since 2010, Apple has been negotiating with publishers to enable the sale of newspaper and magazine subscriptions via the iTunes store for consumption on the iPad (Rabil, Satariano, & Burrows, 2010). In February 2011, publishers reportedly closed deals with Apple. Publishers can sell subscriptions through the iTunes store, but must grant Apple 30% of their revenues (Pompeo, 2011). When a reader buys a subscription with a credit card via the iTunes store, Apple does not need to share the personal details of the subscriber with the newspaper publisher. In this way publishers miss out on valuable user data on their readers (Grueskin, Seave, & Graves, 2011). But apparently, so far, newspaper publishers are not in a position to make better deals and benefit from the secure and reliable sales mechanisms of the iTunes store and of the attractiveness and ease-of-use of iPads, which has made newspaper reading on computers a relative success for the first time. Another experimental model is one where online news providers offer their users subscriptions to a selection of news and other content from different news sources. Users can make their own selections and pay a fee based on the number of articles, categories or sources they have chosen (see, for instance, eLinea 30 ). Instead of buying a full newspaper or magazine, subscribers can select for instance the foreign news articles from the newspaper famous for its foreign news reporting and the book reviews from a newspaper which has high quality cultural sections. This model depends on the willingness of news publishers to cooperate with the new service providers and/or their ability to cooperate and develop such models amongst themselves. Pulse, Zite, Flipboard and others offer similar services, but the first three so far do not yet charge users. Although it is too early for a thorough analysis of the success or failure of these paywalls and other pay models for online news, they already evoke much discussion. The strategic problems with paywalls are threefold (Reichenstein, 2011). First, paywalls do not protect all content. As there is no information shortage online, users might decide to get their 28 It must be noted that the Wall Street Journal had already implemented a paywall in 1996. 29 See for more detailed information: http://www.nytimes.com/subscriptions/Multiproduct/lp5558.html?campaignid=37XQH 30 www.elinea.nl |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling