The author’s responses to the reviewer comments and suggestions

The author’s responses to the reviewer comments and
suggestions.
First of all, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to the reviewer.
We think that all the reviewer’s comments will contribute to improving the
quality of work. According to the reviewer’s comments, we have made the
following changes and additions to the article:
1st comment:
Answer. Yes, the reviewer’s comment It is right, the “From the above, there exist some positive constants such that...” shifted after the definition “Two parameter Mittag-Leffler (M-L) function”, page 3, line 10
2st comment: Page 6, line 10: It is written .... Lemma 3.1... . It should be .... Lemma 3... .
Answer. Yes, that is right: .... Lemma 3.1... is changed to .... Lemma 3...
3st comment: Page 7, lines 24 and 25: It is written . It should be: .
Answer. Yes, that is right: the is changed to .
4st comment: Page 10, line 16, what’s
Answer. In page 11, line 1, it was introduced , .