The diagram illustrates the process by which milk is produced
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Download 19.12 Kb.
|
1 2
Bog'liqtask 1
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?Although in agricultural sectors contemporary technologies which is the main purpose to facilitate people's lifestyles are more available nowadays, the number of human beings are becoming still hungry in some part of the world. This essay will discuss the chief causes of the problem and give possible suggestions to alleviate them. To commence with the main features which contributed hungry among people, are climate change and poverty. To be more exact, as a result of scorching hot the latest around 10 years water shortages are appearing in many areas which is one of the major reasons. For example, some part of African countries suffers from a lack of water and even modern hi-tech is not being also able to solve the problems. Furthermore, poorer people especially in underdeveloped countries are getting insufficient amount of salaries. On the other hand, developed nations may aid poor countries to eliminate getting starvation through technologies and qualified research staff. The reason behind this is that it is possible to handle the land in an accurate manner with the help of up-to-date technologies. Moreover, it should be proper conditions for well-educated researchers to conduct their work in the field of agriculture. Because their explorations, for example, may bring significant profits by creating new as well as fruitful plants. In conclusion, it is true that many people in the world are face up to famine, despite farming advancements currently in use. This can be overcome by providing modern technologies and scholars' knowledge. Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disaster. Do you agree or disagree?It is argued that developed countries are more responsible to donate with the sufficient amount of funds to nations where are poor lifestyle in quality during the natural catastrophe. I agree with this statement and this essay will discuss supporting points in upcoming paragraphs. On the one hand, due to more adverse effects of natural disasters, poorer countries can be supported through foodstuffs and contemporary technologies. Firstly, during the tragedy, a large number of dwellers may suffer its consequences, one of the most obvious options is food supplements. For example, in many African countries, some people lose all their savings in the period of water floods. Secondly, rich states can help with their hi-techs to facilitate harms as well as clear the ruins. On the other hand, people, in this circumstance, need medical aid and shelter which means that these are other proper variants of helping wealthy countries the impoverished nations via their funds. To be more exact, it is possible to support injured people to restore their health with various medicines. Of course, being deprived of accommodations is one of the chief difficulties, so, poor countries may assist their inhabitants to rebuild the damaged areas regarding the financial budget with were got from developed nations. In conclusion, there is a statement about whether prosperous countries should support poverty-stricken nations during a natural disaster. I agree with this situation and developed states can help by ranging from foods and modern technologies to medical supplements and providing accommodations. Download 19.12 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
1 2
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling