The First chapter

GENERAL CONCLUSION
The image of Amir Temur always was been highlighted by the European researchers. Scientists, historians and writers of the different countries made and even now are going on making big contribution to the study of his activity and as a whole Temurids dynasty. R.Clavijo, I. Shiltberger, L. Langle, K. Marlowe, I. Hete, Ed. Poe, Walter, H.Vamberi, H. Hukhem, L. Keren and others are considered to be big scholars in this area for they wrote about Amir Temurs life and marches. Not accidentally phenomenon of Amir Temur was depicted in European literature.
In the central Islamic lands he was firmly embedded in folk culture, while in the nomad steppes, he was a popular figure in folk epics. Because of his enduring fame, Temur remained a source of legitimacy for rulers in Iran and Central Asia, and was recalled by several dynasties of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. For five hundred years after his death Temur remained important in political and intellectual life both because of the dramatic appeal of his deeds, his personality, and the myths surrounding him. To the Europeans the combination of rude shepherd warrior and intellectual patron was odd and piquant. Within the vast section of Asia that Temur’s two worlds overlapped-the Middle East, North India, and Central Asia-the combination of warrior and cultural patron was more accepted, and for that reason useful. Within the steppe itself, the figure of Chinggis Khan remained powerful, but in sedentary and border areas the memory of his ravages and the fact that he had not been Muslim made him problematical as a figure for dynastic legitimacy. Temur’s persona was less ambivalent; fully Muslim, and remembered for his intellectual patronage as well as his military prowess; he could be used where Chinggis could not.
But to understand the scale of the individual, it is necessary to trace her life. For it needs to escape from European history and modern civilization with its prejudices. We need to look at the eyes of Tamerlane people to ride with him.
The fact that the words of the artists often appeal to the image of Amir Temur is not accidental. Statement of lofty ideas in the literature is often made ​​on an example of the description of the activities of great men because on the one hand, evidence of their strong nature and on the other - reflects a certain historical atmosphere, eventful.
Of course, it would be wrong to consider all the works of Amir Temur, solely as a biography of his personality or campaigns chronicle the famous conqueror, because through the interpretation of historical person is always consciously or unconsciously expressed in socio-political, philosophical and aesthetic views of the author.
Muhammad Ali aims to create special works about Amir Temur. Unlike the works of predecessors, Muhammad Ali's novel gives an idea of ​​Amir Temur, not only as a great statesman, but also as an ordinary living man with all of his senses, with human suffering and joy, loving and beloved. This novel is written by the author: "The Temurbek which the Honourable father gave such a tough name was not iron. He, too, loved, burned in the flames of love, grieve, trust was betrayed, dreamed, believed in God, he had all the human qualities. "
It is important to note that this approach is developed by the author against the background of the stereotypes about Amir Temur, solely as a conqueror, leader of the bloodiest campaigns. Indeed, the works created in the Soviet period, the main emphasis is on this. It is clear that these cases were not taken into account the specific historical conditions of life of the great Timur.
The interpretation of the historical figure of such magnitude as Amir Temur can not and should not be limited only by the characteristics of his military activities. Amir Temur was also an enlightened monarch, perhaps the first in the East have addressed to law, he was a patron of the arts and sciences, and the builder of the magnificent cities. Finally, he was a fully developed personality and his outlook on life and people.
We must say that Muhammad Ali depicts Amir Temur not as an angel, does not idealize him. His character can make mistakes and be blind powerless before God and fatal accidents. Repentance and suffering from the mistakes made in the description given to the author of Isfahan events. According to the author, with the growth of power and influence of Timur grows and the extent of his responsibility and, therefore, the consciousness of this responsibility.
Skill disclose the nature and the basic idea of the novel writer Muhammad Ali, in our opinion, it is that he was able to see the progressive historical processes from the point of view of modern political and educational and aesthetic problems. The modern novel "Great dynasty" is that by creating a bright image of the great men of the past is evaluated not only their role in history, but also the importance of their work and moral character of modernity.