Trend not only allows people to purchase items from overseas easily but

As global trade increases, many goods, including those we use on a daily basis, are produced in other countries and have to be transported long distances.

Do the benefits of this trend outweigh the drawbacks?

Nowadays, there is a significant rise in world trade and this means that some goods which are consumed by people have to be made in other parts of the world, and be transported over long distance. While this trend has many benefits, I strongly believe that overall case creates several negative impacts.

There is no doubt that goods which are produced in other countries have many benefits. First of all, companies are able to minimize the cost of their production because they have not to pay an expensive price of workers. For example, most corporations from western countries tend to produce their goods in Thailand due to the lowest salaries of workers. In addition, it can advance the bilateral relationship between two countries such as developing their relationship in politic, economic, health and low policy. Companies also help the government to decrease jobless in their country. Evidence of this can be seen that many large industrial cities around the world have no more jobless. Likewise, long distance transportation also has some benefits. Firstly, it can create new opportunities for drivers. This is because all sorts of transports need drivers to deliver their good to retailers. Next, long distance transportation can add taxes of toll or street which cars use it. None of this would have had some benefits from these events.

However, the main drawback of producing goods in other countries is that it is going to decrease taxes of country house. This is because corporations will pay their taxes to the government where they produce their goods. For example, most companies from United States of America which produce their goods in Indonesia have to pay taxes to Indonesian government. As a result, The United States of America cannot get taxes from their companies. Whilst, long distance transportation makes bad pollution. This is because cars which they use to deliver the number of goods cause carbon emission. For example, most cars which in the street make out bad pollution are danger for human life. As a result, the number of goods which are transported over long distance are not really good for human. There is no more reason that this problem can create carbon emission.

To sum up, producing the number of goods can give many benefits for some corporations and the government because they can add their profits. On the other hand, there are many drawbacks which can damage human life. For this problems, Corporations and the government should make good environment and do not think just about their profits.

Nowadays

children
are getting more inclined towards the
phones
.
Parents
feel the excessive
use
of
phones
could harmful for them. Despite
phones
have made our
lives
better
but
still
have its side effects
as well
.
Children
have
started
spending time on the
phones
which as has
started
affecting their mental and physical growth.

Some
parents

have raised concern regarding the excessive
use
of
phones
by their
children
.
Children
have become more
physically
unfit, since they spend
so
many
on
cell
phones
playing games, watching movies, clicking photos and other social media sites.
For example
, if a child continues playing games on the
phone
do not gout play any sport. At
some
point the child will
start
gaining weight.

If
some

parents
think
its harmful,
but
some
on the other hand
, believe it’s a
very
useful device.
Cell
phones
can
be considered
a safety device, since
parents
can
easily
reach out to their
children
. Nowadays crime rate has increased in all over the world.
For example
, if a child goes out to a party and will be late while coming. In such situation they can
easily
call their
parents
and inform them.

In conclusion

, I would like to say that
cell
phones
definitely a
very
useful resource,
but
at the same it has
own
disadvantages
as well
.
However
,
parents
need to
keep
a
check
, how long the
children
are busy on these devices.
Children
should be
allowed
to
use
their
cell
phones
only
for a short period of time like while they are in school or when go out alone with their friends. This is kind of practice will give them time for other outdoor activities.
Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, some part of community affairs are derivative from issues that students take in high school. Some individuals think that voluntary social programs
such
as charity affairs, developing neighbourhood or work at the gym should be mandatory in high schools for youngsters. I personally agree with the given statements on the basis of learning, social behaviour and encounter with hard situations.
To begin
with, the main reason is that social behaviour is a determining factor when young people want to get a job. Community affairs lead students deal with the people that not only working without getting a salary to their job, but some of them spent money from their pocket for charity affairs. The more participate in community affairs by youngsters, the better improve their social manners.
For example
, feeding of poor people at church can enhance sympathy of students with individuals who have not sufficient money to prepare daily food.
Hence
, free public jobs can increase the responsibility of young students to society. Having said that,
however
, development of social behaviour are not the only factor in
this
respect, other arguments is that children will be encountered with the hard situations that they have not experienced yet.
That is
to say,
this
unpaid social jobs is almost the types of occupation which most of the students didn't know about them and they may face them in the future.
Therefore
, Students are more likely to learn how to solve the unpredictable problems that they may exist on the hard condition.
For instance
, teaching English to foreign students is a good experience for students, to know more about the culture of other countries.
Thus
, they would know how to manage the problems and deal with them. To conclude, I personally that the view that it is acceptable to put students on free public services.
This
is mainly because young people need to know how to behave in society and how to deal with problems in their real life.

In the last few years, many new ideas and beliefs arose aiming to improve society and reinforce the relationship between members of a society. One of the proposed ideas, yet under observation, is to make it compulsory for high school students to do some programmes, of course, charity ones, to assist their community.

Firstly, I am completely supporting the idea that: helping promote the society is one of the main duties of a righteous and positive member. Imagine that in the vacation, some youths, and even all ages, work for charitable organisations which help the poor, the sick, the learners and others. Imagine other group cleaning and decorating the streets- of course, that won't affect their dignity- or teaching the young. Indeed that will lead to an extremely modern, civilised and loving community. However, all these are examples, and there are many other ways to improve societies, both charitable and uncharitable methods. Despite this, the idea of compulsory charitable work doesn't sound good for me. I believe that making that compulsory, will not lead to the heroic purpose of the charitable work i.e. the inner desire to help others, but, instead, will make it a type of finishing your work.

I know that this proposed idea aims to teach high school students to be responsible to their society and to take care of others, but I think there is a more efficient method. There are now working groups in many schools in different places which do such charitable work and even without inspiration from the school's administration. So why not make many groups in all schools, and I think that will attract many students.

In conclusion, I think there are other better ways to promote the society without making it compulsory; the sitting compulsory subjects are enough.

(Approximately 294 words)
(by Abdallah Hassan)