2. Learner-designed
If student participation is a central pillar to success, then why not let them help design
their own tests?
Over the years, teaching has become progressively more student-centric and
participatory. This next
type of assessment
is a product of that school of thought.
Here’s what it looks like: A week or two before testing is set to begin, do a review day
with students. Go through every lesson together and determine what would qualify as
mastering that lesson, what would qualify as passing/average and what would qualify as
failing/unsatisfactory.
Let’s say the chapter you’re looking at covers irregular verb conjugation and vocabulary
about weather. Students could determine that, in order to have mastered this chapter,
they should be able to:
•
Show that they can conjugate all of the main irregular verbs (written exercise)
•
Be able to use them in a sentence (written & verbal exercises)
•
Have a conversation using them without making mistakes (verbal exercise)
•
Write a 300-word text that incorporates all of their weather vocabulary and each
irregular verb, using a provided word bank (written exercise)
This is a time-consuming process, but by the end, not only have you developed a logical,
end-of-course assessment that your students think is fair, you’ve also made them
accountable and invested. They designed the test, after all.
The test-designing class activity doubles as a thorough review of everything learned in
the course.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |