Women should have an equal role alongside men both in police and armed forces. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Women should have an equal role alongside men both in police and armed forces. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The number of women in police services as well as in army has been increasing for the last two decades. But I personally believe that females don’t fit these spheres according to the mental and physical differences between men and women.
The first reason why I am against this idea that females are much weaker than their counterparts due to their nature, which makes them less suitable for these kinds of physically demanding jobs. As every knows, police officers and soldiers must be always operative and strong enough to catch criminals or fight against them. Another difference is that cognitive abilities of females and males are dissimilar. In fact, women are stronger in actions related to intuition, while men are better in analyzing, which has a big role in working in police and armed forces. For example, a female can perform more excellenty in marketing or designing compared to being an accountant or detective.
Furthermore, the people in these spheres frequently overwork. According to statistics given by News Time, only in 2022, on average a policeman has to do his job more 50 hours than agreed and goes to work at least 6 days a month on off days. Consequently, this factor prevents most females from joining these fields also, as they are much more important in household activities as well as in raising children. From this point of view, I think, like many others, that for most of them nine-to-five job suits best.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that women had better not go for spheres such as police or army, since these professions are not suitable for females physically and mentally.


Women should have an equal role alongside men both in police and armed forces. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Increasing numbers of women are choosing to join in military and police force. Although I think that females should be given enough chances in such national security division, I personally disagree, with the idea that there is no need for an equal participation in certain positions.
One the one hand, women should be chosen for jobs according to their skills, qualifications and character. Indeed, females are capable of doing jobs in which communication and high pressure are involved. For example, Marta Chavez, who was the minister of national defence in Peru from 1990 to 1995, marked an important precedent being the first woman in the charge. Furthermore, she was an important figure in the fight against terrorism in those years, illustrating the large ability of women to resolve and create strategies in decisive periods.
On the other hand, it is an undeniable fact that both males and females have specific characteristics. A great number of positions in military and police forces require physical strength, which made it more suitable for men. To illustrate this more, take the case of the police force, who may constantly encounter fight with protesters on the street, charging heavy weapons and barriers, using only force to retain the crowd. Furthermore, rough times as the war situation often require an objective point of view rather than sensitive emotions, this could be a transcendental choice between staying alive or death.
By way of conclusion, considering the fact that there are a great number of positions in the army and police force that require high physical power, I fully support the idea that there is no need to have equal roles.