Reviewer 1 (Associate Editor of the Journal)

Reviewer 1 (Associate Editor of the Journal)

I cannot approve the Publication of the article 5115-1017 in WSEAS Transactions.

English Language
The authors must make the necessary corrections in the English Language.
They must correct all their grammatical errors
So, this article cannot be published in the present form now. 
The reason is that the article has some grammatical errors
In order to improve their paper, the authors may copy-paste their text inside
the GMAIL.
Because some authors cannot understand what they have to do, we have uploaded a VIDEO that can help them.
Click and watch this video
https://00f28ca.netsolhost.com/webcamera/correctyourmistakes.webm
After the corrections, they must send us back a file in .docx format
(only Word for Windows in the revised versions, please)
The authors are kindly requested not send us PDF

Check also if the in-text citations exist in the reference list
also Check if all the articles in the reference list exist in the in-text citations

Check also if the in-text citations for Tables, Equations and Figures are connected with Tables, Equations and Figures properly.

Note, that WSEAS publishes articles that are 100% correct in English and the Format

See again https://wseas.com/format.php


Reviewer 2
- The introduction should be rewritten in a more successive way. A comparative analysis of the bibliography presented in introduction would be very useful.
- It is mentioned on page 6 that " A special opening and closing place was left on one side of the tents for the purpose of specially inserting the handcuffs and monitoring the damage levels of the cotton crop." More justification should be furnished on this issue.

- Table 3 ‘Biological efficacy of insecticides against cotton bugs in cotton plants' should be analysed in the main text in more detail.

- The authors claim: "The most effective drugs against heteroptera are: Safegor, 40% emulsion concentrate (98.3%), Ribo Super, 25% suspension concentrate (93.4%), Transform, 50% water soluble granules (92.5%) and Mosetam 20 SP (82.8-81.9%)." More details are required.
- What could be the future directions of the article in this research area?
- Authors have checked punctuation and misprints in the manuscript and made appropriate corrections where necessary.

Reviewer 3
In the conclusion section, the authors write: “If fine fiber cotton is damaged by cotton bugs (100-150 specimens per 100 bushels) during the vegetation period, the cotton yield is reduced by 55.5-65.3%.” Can you give us more details and explanations?
Section 3.3 "Determining the damage caused by herbivorous bugs to the cotton crop" in the present form is relatively weak and should be strengthened with more details and explanations.
It is necessary that the authors clearly discuss how their work provides a contribution beyond alternative studies.
Why is this paper important to cotton plants? Please, explain.