501 Critical Reading Questions

Critical Reading Questions

---

1 7 9
341.
d. The author does not directly state that Mozart’s illnesses were
the result of exhaustion. She may imply this by describing
Mozart’s exhausting schedule and then stating that he became ill
on tour. However, she does not make the connection explicit.
342.
b. The main point of the passage is to describe Mozart’s experi-
ences as a child prodigy, or a highly talented child. Choices a
and c are too narrow in scope, and choices d and e are not
explicitly stated in the passage.
501
Critical Reading Questions

---

---

Questions 343–346 are based on the following passage.
This passage is adapted from an article authored by the environmental
protection organization Greenpeace, regarding Finland’s destruction of old-
growth forests.
Time is running out for the old-growth forests of Finland. The vast
majority of Finland’s valuable old-growth forest is owned by the state
and logged by the state-owned company Metsähallitus. Metsähallitus’
logging practices include clearcutting, logging in habitats of threat-
ened and vulnerable species, and logging in areas of special scenic or
cultural value—including in areas that are critical for the reindeer
herding of the indigenous Sami people.
Despite being involved in a “dialogue process” with two environ-
mental organizations (World Wildlife Fund and the Finnish Associa-
tion for Nature Conservation), to try and reach agreement regarding
additional protection for old-growth forests, Metsähallitus is now log-
ging sites that should be subject to negotiation.
In June 2003, Greenpeace and the Finnish Association for Nature
Conservation (FANC) presented comprehensive maps of the old-
growth areas that should be subject to moratorium, pending discus-
sion and additional protection, to all those involved in the dialogue
process. Metsähallitus then announced a halt to new logging opera-
7
Science and Nature
1 8 1
(1)
(5)
(10)
(15)

---

tions in these mapped areas. Sadly, the halt in logging was short lived.
In August and September logging took place in at least six old-growth
forest areas in Northern Finland.
It seems Metsähallitus wants to have its cake and eat it too—friendly
talks with environmental groups at the same time they keep logging
critical habitat. To be blunt, their commitment to the dialog process
has proven untrustworthy. The new logging has been without con-
sensus from the dialog process or proper consultation with the Sami
reindeer herders. Now there’s a risk the logging will expand to include
other old-growth areas.
Greenpeace investigations have revealed a number of companies
buying old-growth timber from Metsähallitus, but the great majority
goes to Finland’s three international paper manufacturers, Stora Enso,
UPM-Kymmene, and M-Real. Greenpeace recommends that com-
panies ask for written guarantees that no material from any of the
recently mapped old-growth areas is entering or will enter their sup-
ply chain, pending the switch to only timber that has been independ-
ently certified to the standards of the Forest Stewardship Council in
order to stop this risk to protected forests.
343.
According to the passage, which is NOT a logging practice
engaged in by Metsähallitus?