Б. С. Хаймович, Б. И. Роговская теоретическая грамматика английского языка

Participle II is mostly used to modify nouns.
E. g. My forgotten friend ... Marlow was dead and buried.

As to participle I, the combinability of different gram­memes is different.

The non-perfect active participle may modify both nouns and verbs.
E. g. His smiling eyes; smiling slyly, he stretched out his hand.
The non-perfect passive usually modifies verbs, but occasionally (when the verb is durative) nouns. -
E. g. Not being invited there, I chose to stay at home. It would be advisable to achieve agreement on measures to discontinue the war propaganda being conducted in certain states. (Daily Worker).
The other grammemes are used only to modify verbs.
E. g. Having been detained by the flood, he came late.

§ 320. English participles like those of Russian, Ukrainian and other languages, may sometimes develop into adjectives, the idea of quality gradually overshadowing that of action, as in standing water — стоячая вода, a charming woman — очаровательная женщина, written work — письменная (контрольная) работа. They may develop into nouns, the idea of substance outweighing that of action — the wounded —раненый, the accused — обвиняемый, the deceased — покойный etc. Both adjectivization and substantivization involve the сhange of combinability and function, i. e. they are cases of conversion (see § 57).

The Gerund

§ 321. The gerund is a verbid characterized by the following features:

1. Its dual lexico-grammatical meaning of an action partially viewed as a substance.
2. The categories of voice and order (see paradigm on p. 186).
3. The group morpheme -ing.
4. The combinability resembling that of the verb (the gerund is associated with adverbs, with nouns or pronouns denoting the object of the action) and that of the noun (the gerund is associated with prepositions, with the conjoint possessive pronouns, nouns in the possessive case).
E. g. The district is justified in blindly ignoring the county. (Bennett).
5. The syntactical functions of subject, complement, attribute, etc.
E. g. His returning so soon surprised his family. (Mere­dith). I remember meeting him in London. (Collins).

§322. The gerund, like the infinitive, combines verbal and noun features, yet the gerund is more of a noun than the infinitive, which is to some extent explained by the fact that the gerund became part of the verb system much later than the infinitive.

The combinability of the gerund differs considerably from that of the infinitive. Thus, the gerund may be preceded by a preposition, as in She thought of going there. We insisted on staying here. The wisdom of l i v i n g is greater than the wisdom of the book. (Abrahams).
In contrast to the infinitive, the gerund is often accompa­nied by a noun in the possessive case or a possessive pronoun. Sometimes the action denoted by the gerund is not associated with any doer, any producer of the action, as in Living is striving.
Very often the doer is not clear, as in I like singing (it is not clear whether I myself like to sing or I like other people's singing). This is much rarer with the infinitive, which mostly denotes an action whose subject is represented by some word in the sentence. Cf. I like singing and I like to sing (in the latter sentence the doer of the action denoted by to sing is represented by I).
The gerund, as H. Sweet says, is less of a verb than the infinitive, inasmuch as it does not join in the conjugation , of the finite verb.
In addition, the infinitive possesses a peculiar modal force not observed in the gerund, as in the article to be translated (=which must be translated).

§ 323. Some grammarians are of the opinion that the diffe­rence between these rival forms — the infinitive and the gerund — is an aspective one, the gerund representing an action in its progress (accordingly it is thought to be imper­fective) and the infinitive — representing an action in its entirety (accordingly it is thought to be perfective). Besides, the gerund is believed to denote a general action, the infini­tive — a concrete one.

Many linguists (among them Curme) refute this point of view and supply examples showing that the differentiation is not felt in actual usage. Thus, in the sentence It has a bad air your forgetting me so early, though a gerund is used, a concrete, individual instance is meant.
It is hard to foretell how the rivalry of these forms will progress. It is quite probable that the gerund and the infi­nitive will be further differentiated. In Modern English speech the gerund is, probably, the only usual verbid after 1) some verbs such as to advise, to avoid, to delay, to deny, to enjoy, to escape, to excuse, to fancy, to finish, to give up, to go on, to imagine, to keep on, to leave off, to mind, to put off, to postpone, to quit, to set about, to stop, to suggest; 2) cer­tain verb-groups such as can't help (bear, stand, stomach, suffer); after verbs with fixed prepositions such as to accuse (of), to agree (to), to approve (of); 3) adlinks and adjec­tives — aware (of), capable (of), fond (of), proud (of), etc.
On the other hand, some verbs can attach an infinitive, but not a gerund, as to hope, to promise, to refuse, to start out, etc.

§ 324. The gerund, which is a peculiarity of the English language, is very extensively used as the centre of complexes (nexuses) synonymous with subordinate clauses. Compare:

I know of his h a v i n g g o n e to Kiev.
I know that he has gone to Kiev.
There are probably few types of subordinate clauses which have no synonymous complexes. Compare:

That he is ill is known.	His being ill is known.
I know that he has come.	I know of his having come.
After they had come, he hurried to his sister.	On their coming he hurried to his sister.
Your plan that we should stay here is not good.	Your plan of our staying here is not good.
Though he is young, he is a skilled worker.	Despite his being young, he is a skilled worker, etc.

It does not follow that the gerund constructions are equiv­alent to the subordinate clauses, but the given examples are intended to prove the 'versatility' of the gerund construc­tions.

§ 325. In conclusion we think it necessary to add a few words concerning the so-called 'half-gerund', as in the exam­ples Excuse my boys (them) having bored you so. The gerund used in this complex differs from a 'classical' gerund but in having a noun in the common case as its sub­ject-word. The common case established itself early with nouns that have no possessive case. The usage has spread very rapidly in recent years. At present such complexes are common: a) with nouns that have no case opposemes: The back-benchers insisted on the treaty being ra­tified. (The Worker); b) with nouns accompanied by attributes in post-position: Fancy a w о т a n of taste buying a hat like that. (Christie); c) to avoid ambiguity which might arise in oral speech if the gerund were connected with a noun in the possessive case: I imagine his son (son's) marrying so young; d) when the gerund is pre­ceded by more than one noun: She objected to children and women s т о k i n g; e) when it is desirable to stress the person component of this complex:

I hate the idea of у о и wasting your time. (Mau­gham).
Though there is no unity of opinion about the nature of such forms, we do not think it expedient to have a special name for them. Examples like those given above merely show that the subject words of the gerund may also be nouns (pronouns) in the common case (or nouns and pronouns having no case opposites) and pronouns in the objective case.
The use of the common or the objective case form to express the agent of the action denoted by the gerund makes it pos­sible to use gerundial complexes with a much greater number of nouns and pronouns.
This usage is suggestive of the further verbalization of the gerund, of some important change in its combinability.