Chapter I. Reflection of the combination of national mentality and language through numeral components in numerological phraseological units on the material of english and uzbek languages
Download 0.85 Mb.
|
diplom finall last
|
CONCLUSION
1. The study of phraseological units with numerological components in Uzbek and English languages has yielded valuable insights into the similarities and differences between these two languages. 2. The analysis of the data has revealed that both languages have a rich stock of phraseological units that incorporate numerological elements, indicating that this is a common feature of both languages. 3. The research has also shown that there are significant differences in the way numerological components are used in Uzbek and English phraseological units. In Uzbek, there is a greater emphasis on the symbolic and mystical aspects of numerology, while in English, the focus is more on the practical and everyday use of numbers and their associated meanings. 4. The study has also demonstrated the importance of cultural context in the interpretation and use of phraseological units with numerological components. 5. In both languages, many of these expressions are deeply rooted in cultural traditions and beliefs, and an understanding of these cultural contexts is essential for their effective use. 6. Furthermore, the research has highlighted the challenges that arise when translating phraseological units with numerological components from one language to another. 7. The differences in cultural context and linguistic structure can make it difficult to convey the full meaning and impact of these expressions in translation, and translators must be aware of these challenges in order to produce accurate and effective translations. 8. The study of phraseological units with numerological components in Uzbek and English languages has shed light on an interesting and important aspect of these two languages. 9. The research has shown that these expressions are an integral part of both languages and that they provide a rich source of cultural and linguistic insight. 10. Further research in this area could yield additional insights into the use and interpretation of these expressions and their role in shaping the languages and cultures in which they are used. 1Mirziyoyev Sh. M., " Measures on further Enhancement in higher education system" PD 2909, 2017 20 April, Tashkent 2 Pedro A.Fuertes-Olivera, Metaphor and Motivation: a study of English informal phraseological units, New-York, 1998 3 Felicity ODell and Michael McCarthy, English idioms in use (advanced), Cambridge University Press, 2010 4 Bobrovynk S.M.,''Etymology of English idioms'', Нацioнальний технiчний унiверситет Украïни ''КПI'', 2016 . 6 Makkai, Adam. “Idiom Structure in English.” The Hague: Mouton, 1972. P-471-474 7 Маслова В.А. Лингокультурологическое исследование: Учеб. для студ. ун-тов. — М.: Академия, 2010. — 208 8 Tairova, F. (2021). The Notion of Phraseological Unit. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 7(1), 454-460. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/62/55 9 Teliya V. Bragina N. Oparina E. Sandomirskaya I. Phraseology as a language of culture: its role in the representation of a collective mentality in Cowie (ed.) 1998. –203p. 10 Маслова В. А. Лингвокультурология: учеб. пособие для студ. высш. учеб. заведений / В. А. Маслова // - М. : Академия, 2007. - с. 208. 11 Тер-Минасова С. Г. Язык и межкультурная коммуникация /С. Г. Тер- Минасова// - М. : Слово, 2000. - с. 624. 12 . Маслова В. А. Лингвокультурология: учеб. пособие для студ. высш. учеб. заведений / В. А. Маслова // - М. : Академия, 2007. - с. 208. 13 Teliya V. Bragina N. Oparina E. Sandomirskaya I. Phraseology as a language of culture: its role in the representation of a collective mentality in Cowie (ed.) 1998. 203p. 14 Korzyukova Z.V. The main aspects of the functioning of phraseological units with proper names in the English language: national and cultural specificity. Diss. for Cand. of Philol. sciences. - Moscow, 2003. 15 Berdiyorov H., Rasulov R.Paremiological Dictionary of Uzbek language. Tashkent: Teacher, 1984, p. 59. 16 Plotin, Selected works (М: RM, 1994) 17 Maslova V. A. (1997). Vvedenie v lingvokul'turologiyu [Introduction to linguoculturology]. Moscow: Nasledie. P.78. (in Russian) 18 Gailomazova E.S. (2010). Pragmatic Content of Numerals. Humanities and socio-economic sciences. № 6. p.p. 125-132. 19 V.F. Hopper, Medieval number symbolism: its sources, meaning, and influence on thought and expression (N.Y., Mineola: Dover Publications Inc., 2000). p 131-132 20 Yu. N. Karaulov, Language steps And images of the world (M., 2000) 21 G. Frege, Philosophical and mathematical correspondence (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980) p.178 22 Elena V. Fedyaeva, Quantity VS Quality: Logical-Philosophical and Cognitive Bases of Interaction 24 E.S. Kubryakova, V.Z. Dem'yankov, Yu.G. Pankrats, L.G. Luzina, Abridged Dictionary of Cognitive Terms (M.: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 1997). p 33-34 25 N.N. Boldyrev, Cognitive Nature of Language: Collected Essays (M.-Berlin : Direkt-Media, 2016), p 170. 26 Plotin, Selected works (М: RM, 1994), p 99. 27 V.F. Hopper, Medieval number symbolism: its sources, meaning, and influence on thought and expression (N.Y., Mineola: Dover Publications Inc., 2000), p 18. 28 Plotin, Selected works (М: RM, 1994), p 13. 29 Yu. N. Karaulov, Language steps And images of the world (M., 2000), p 384. 30 Plotin, Selected works (М: RM, 1994), p 376. 31 L.A. Kozlova, Ethnocultural Potential of a Language Grammatical Structure and its Realization in the Grammar of the Speaker (Barnaul: AltGPA, 2009), p 141. 32 Kubryakova E.S. Language and Knowledge: On the Way of Acquiring Knowledge about Language: Parts of Speech in Cognitive Framework. The Role of Language in the World Cognition (M.: Languages of Slavic culture, 2004), 82. 33 Philips D. A. The Complete Book of Numerology, 2005, - P 7. 34 Javane F., Bunker D., Numerology and the Divine Triangle, 1979, - P 10 35 Goodwin M. O., Numerology: The Complete Guide, Volume 1, 1984, - P 4 36Chrisomalis, S. (2010). Numerical Notation: A Comparative history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 4 37 Saussure, F. (1983). Course on general Linguistics. Open court publishing. p 67 38 Hopper, V. F. (1938). Medieval Number Symbolism. Its sources, Meaning, and Influence on Thought and Expression, New York: Dover. 39 Simpson, J.(1987). European Mythology, New York: P. Bedrick Books. 40 Tokarev S.A. (1998). Myfi narodov myra: Encyclopedia in 2 v. M.: Bolshaia rossiakaia encyclopedia 41 Donohue, M. (2008). Complexities with restricted numeral systems. Linguistic Typology, 12(3), 423429. 42 https://www.worldnumerology.com/numerology-one.htm (date of access 29.01. 2023) 43 https://www.whats-your-sign.com/meaning-of-numbers.html (date of access 29.01. 2023) 44 https://www.whats-your-sign.com/meaning-of-numbers.html (date of access 29.01. 2023) 45 https://www.worldnumerology.com/numerology-four.htm (date of access 8.02. 2023) 46 https://www.whats-your-sign.com/meaning-of-numbers.html (date of access 21.02.2023) 47 https://www.whats-your-sign.com/meaning-of-numbers.html (date of access 21.02. 2023) 48 https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/symbolism-and-significance-of-number-7/article25851028.ece (date of access 01.03.2023) 49 https://www.chinahighlights.com/travelguide/chinese-zodiac/lucky-unlucky-numbers.htm (date pf access 05.03.2023) 50 https://www.learnreligions.com/the-significance-of-the-number-nine-in-hinduism-1770457 (date of access 05.03.2023) 51 https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/symbolism-and-significance-of-number-10/article25860373.ece(date of access 05.03.2023) 52 https://www.psychnewsdaily.com/33-angel-number-meaning-and-its-symbolism/ (date of access 19.04.2023) 53 https://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/a39304449/666-angel-number-meaning-numerology. (date of access 21.04.2023) 54 Кunin A.V. The Course of phraseology of Modern English. Moscow. High School, 1986 55 Bindel, E. 2000. Mistica numerelor [The Mysticism of Numbers]. Bucureşti: Harald. p 15. 56 Stanojević, Maja (2009), "Cognitive synonymy: a general overview" (PDF), Facta Universitatis, Linguistics and Literature Series, 7 (2): 193 57 DiMarco, Chrysanne, and Graeme Hirst. "Usage notes as the basis for a representation of near-synonymy for lexical choice." Proceedings of 9th annual conference of the University of Waterloo Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary and Text Research. 1993. 58 Grambs, David. The Endangered English Dictionary: Bodacious Words Your Dictionary Forgot. WW Norton & Company, 1997. 59 Usarova, M. Semantic pecularities of measurative phraseological units in English, 2021. 60 Dictionary of Symbols and Imagery, (date of access 20.12.2022) 61 Alekhina A.I. Fundamentals of phraseology of the Russian language. - St. Petersburg, 1997. P. 152. 62 Sokolova G.G. Components of the connotative meaning of phraseological units // Linguistic problems of translation. - Moscow: Higher School, 1981. P. 345 63 Кунин А.В. Курс фразеологии современного английского языка. – Дубна,, 2005. –C.154 64 Yakubov F., Diyarov A., Masudov Z. 65 Башиева С.К. Стилистический компонент фразеологического значения: Автореф. дисс…. канд. филол. наук. – Краснодар: КГУ, 1995. – 23 с. 66 Арнольд И. В. Лексикология современного английского языка. – М.: Издательство литературы на иностранных языках, 1959. – C 165. 67 Кунин А.В. Курс фразеологии современного английского языка. – Дубна: Феникс+, 2005. -C 156 68 Новиков Л.А. Русская антонимия и ее лексикографическое описание – во введении к словарю: Львов М.Р. Словарь антонимов русского языка. Москва, 1984, с.7 69 Ожегов С.И. О структуре фразеологии. Лексикология. Лексикография. Культура речи. Москва, 1974, с.212 Download 0.85 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: 
|