171
11
Fig. 11.1 Mathematical model with churning from technology 2 to technology 1.
(Authors’ own figure)
Potential users
Flow of
Churning users
Technology 2
Technology 1
Flow
of new users
N − A − B
rB
A
A
p(N
− A −
B)
p(N
−
A
− B
)
A
N
e
B
N
N
p r
pe
p r e
pt
rt
pt
1
2
2
2
.
.
Figure
11.2
shows the evolution
of the market for
p = 0.5 and
r = 0.1. The ordinate is the market
share (
A/
N,
B/
N),
and the abscissa is
the number of years after the tech-
nology was introduced.
In this model,
there is a net
churning from technology 2 to tech-
nology 1, and technology 1 captures
the whole market in the end. If the
net
churning had been from tech-
nology 1 to technology 2, then tech-
nology 2 would have captured the
whole market. The alternative the
market
chooses cannot be predicted
by standard economic theory. Both
alternatives are stable equilibria,
and which of them is finally chosen
is path dependent.
The
theoretical market evolu-
tion shown in
.
Fig.
11.2
is not too
different
from the actual evolution
of the VHS and Betamax markets
as described in
7
Case
Study
11.1
.
After about 4 years VHS had cap-
tured almost 60% of the US market,
and after 13
years VHS controlled
more than 90% of that market.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: