Content: introduction effective interactive technologies and their role in enhancing discourse competence of learners


GLOSSARY Digital transformation -


Download 54.87 Kb.
bet8/8
Sana16.06.2023
Hajmi54.87 Kb.
#1495857
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8
Bog'liq
tayyor The usage of interactive technologies in developing discourse competence

GLOSSARY

  1. Digital transformation - the process of using digital technologies to create new — or modify existing — business processes, culture, and customer experiences to meet changing business and market requirements. This reimagining of business in the digital age is digital transformation.

  2. Interactive learning -  a hands-on/real life approach to education founded upon building student engagement through guided social interaction. ... Interactive learning is a holistic methodology that has both online and offline components, which together make a complete educational experience.

  3. Discourse competence - Discourse competence refers to the ability to understand and express oneself in a given language.Rhetorical or effective discourse competence is often defined as how well an individual can contribute to a conversation.

  4. Target language - The definition of a target language is a language that someone is learning, or a language into which a text has to be translated.

  5. Personal devices - Typically refers to a laptop, tablet or smartphone owned by an individual.

  6. Homeschooling - Homeschooling is a progressive movement around the country and the world, in which parents educate their children at home instead of sending them to a traditional public or private school. 

  7. Educational platforms - educational platform or academic platform It is a virtual program whose function is to create virtual spaces to share information. It is intended for teachers and students.


REFERENCES
1. Agarwal, R. and A. E. Day (1998), “The Impact of the Internet On Economic Education,” Journal of Economic Education 29 (2), 99-110.
2. Anonymous (2006), “Thomson Learning and Turning Technologies Pilot Reveals College Students More Likely to Attend Class and Interact With Instructor as a Result of Added Technology Resources,” PR Newswire (Jan. 31), 1.
3. Arnould, E. J. and L. L. Price (1993), “River Magic: Extraordinary Experience and the Extended Service Encounter,” Journal of Consumer Research 20 (June), 24-45.
4. Carnaghan, C. and A. Webb (2005), “Investigating the Effects of Group Response Systems on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in Accounting Education,” working paper from the School of Accountancy at the University of Waterloo.
5. Cole, C. A. and S. K. Balasubramanian (1993), “Age Differences in Consumers’ Search for Information: Public Policy Implications,” Journal of Consumer Research 20 (June), 157-169.
6. Eastman, J.K. (2007), “Enhancing Classroom Communication With Interactive Technology: How Faculty Can Get Started,” College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal 3 (1), 31-38.
7. Fisher, R. J. and L. L. Price (1991), “The Relationship Between International Travel Motivations and Cultural Receptivity,” Journal of Leisure Research 23 (3), 193-208.
8. Hoffman, C. and S. Goodwin (2006), “A Clicker For Your Thoughts: Technology For Active Learning,” New Library World 107 (1228/1229), 422-433.
9. Karakaya, F., T.L. Ainscough, and J. Chopoorian (2001), “The Effects of Class Size and Learning Style on Student Performance In A Multimedia-Based Marketing Course,” Journal of Marketing Education 23 (2), 84.
10. Kurdziel, J. (2005), “Engaging Students in Large Lectures Using a Classroom Response System,” www.crlt.umich.edu/faculty/JoKurdziel02-05.pdf (accessed June 27, 2005).
11.Canale, Michael (1983). “From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy”. En Jack C. Richards y Richard W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication, 2–27. Londres: Longman.
12.Celce-Murcia, Marianne. 2007. “Rethinking the Role of Communicative Competence in Language Teaching”. En Eva Alcón Soler y Maria Pilar Safont Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning, 41–57. Dordrecht: Springer.
13.Consejo de Europa (2008). MAREP. Marco de Referencia para los Enfoques Plurales de las Lenguas y de las Culturas. Estrasburgo: European Centre for Modern Languages / Consejo de Europa.
14.Hymes, Dell H. (1971). “On Communicative Competence”. En J. B. Pride y J. Holmes (Eds.) (1972), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, 269-293. Baltimore, USA: Penguin Education, Penguin Books Ltd. [Traducción al español en «Acerca de la competencia comunicativa». En Llobera, M. et al. (1995). Competencia comunicativa. Documentos básicos en la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras. Madrid: Edelsa, 27-47].



1 WWW.SHAVKAT/MIRZIYOYEV.UZ

2 Hymes 1971, van Ek 1986, Canale 1983, Celce-Murcia 2007

3 Canale 1983, as cited in Korsvold 1997:11f

4 van Ek 1986:47

5 Arnould, E. J. and L. L. Price (1993), “River Magic: Extraordinary Experience and the Extended Service Encounter,” Journal of Consumer Research

6 Cole, C. A. and S. K. Balasubramanian (1993), “Age Differences in Consumers’ Search for Information: Public Policy Implications,” Journal of Consumer Research


Download 54.87 Kb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling