22
performance audits on contingent debt; (ii) this audit work should reflect SAI’s and
parliament’s assessment of the relative importance of this subject while making an
appropriate contribution to
parliamentary accountability; (iii) the SAI could add value
through the examination of how the government identifies and classifies its liabilities,
including contingent debts; (iv) when examining the expected
cost of contingent debts, the
SAI should consider whether all liabilities that can be quantified have been properly
quantified, whether appropriate descriptive information is produced about nonquantifiable
debts, and whether proper attention has been paid to implicit
liabilities and their
quantification; (v) when considering the adequacy of arrangements for reporting contingent
debts to parliament, the SAI should assess them against
the criteria of completeness,
understandability, accuracy, regularity, and consistency; (vi) the
SAI should also consider
whether the amounts budgeted for contingent debts are adequate to cover the likely costs; and
(vii) when examining the risk management processes around contingent debt,
the SAI should
consider whether the arrangements in place are appropriate for the country’s specific
circumstances and whether there are practical improvements that should be made.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: