Education of the republic of uzbekistan termiz state university faculty of foreign philology departament of english language teaching methodolog


Download 46.24 Kb.
bet7/7
Sana23.12.2022
Hajmi46.24 Kb.
#1046139
1   2   3   4   5   6   7
Bog'liq
ingliz tili Axror

Conclusion
The present study explored the effect of using Goh and Burns’ teaching-speaking framework on a group of low-intermediate EFL university students in Taiwan and their strategy use for speaking English. This integrated teaching approach focused on lexical/grammatical knowledge, communicative purpose, and strategy use, and helped the EG participants gradually increase speaking proficiency and develop use of rehearsal and interactional strategies. Without an explicit framework or clear guidance, speaking progress remained temporary, as in the case of the CG.
Although the present study has yielded findings that have both theoretical and pedagogical Language Education & Assessment , 4 implications, it has some limitations. The first limitation concerns the generalization of the results to other populations with different educational backgrounds and language proficiency. Second, the use of Goh and Burns’ integrated teaching-speaking framework suffers from the difficulties of effectively improving certain linguistic abilities, say, pronunciation and grammatical accuracy, in speaking, which may require additional training and more advanced language proficiency to develop it. Further research might usefully extend the present use of the speaking framework to examine the impact of a variety of tasks to learners of different English proficiency.
Developing and enhancing fluency, accuracy, and complexity in speaking a foreign language is a long process. In an EFL learning context where English is mainly used and spoken in the classroom, creating an environment for students to practice the learned language, skills, and strategies, guiding them to carry out the tasks, and allowing them to reflect on their own learning outcomes are necessary. Previous studies have shown that specific teaching approaches, such as task-based language teaching or strategy-based instruction, have had positive impacts on improving students’ speaking ability in general.
REFERENCES

  1. A.W. Frisby, "Teaching English", The English Language Book Society and Longmans Green and Co(1957)., p.98.

  2. Alternative formats for evaluating content area vocabulary understanding. Michele L. Simpson. Testing a student's full grasp of a concept requires some different vocabulary tests. Here are some approaches that are easy to use in the classroom. Journal of Reading (31: 1, October 1987), pp. 20‑27.

  3. Coady, J.. L2 acquisition through extensive reading. In J. Coady and T. Huckin, (eds.). Secondary language vocabulary acquisition. (1997).New York: Cambridge University Press.

  4. Cobb, T. & Horst, M.. Reading academic English: carrying learners across the lexical threshold. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock, Research perspectives in English for academic purposes(2001). (315-329). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  5. Cobb, T. Breadth and depth of vocabulary acquisition with hands-on concordancing. [Electronic version].computer Assisted Language Learning (1999), 345-360.

  6. Cobb, T. (n. d.). Why & how to use frequency lists to learn words. Retrieved October 1, 2014

  7. Coxhead, A. & Nation, P.. The specialised vocabulary of English for academic purposes. (252-267). In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock, Research perspectives in English for academic purposes. (2001) (315-329). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  8. Coxhead, A. A new Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (2): 213-238.

  9. Enhancing Possible Sentences through cooperative learning. Sharon J. Jensen and Frederick A. Duffelmeyer. Open to Suggestion. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy (39: 8, May 1996), (2000) pp.658-659.

  10. Haynes, M.. Patterns and perils of guessing in second language reading. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & M. Coady, Second language reading and vocabulary learning. (1983) (24-45). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

  11. Horst M., Cobb, T. & Meara, P.. Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. [Electronic version] Reading in a Foreign Language, (1998) 11 (2).

  12. Hulstijn, J. and B. Laufer.. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics 22 (1), (2002a).1-26.

  13. Hulstijn, J. and B. Laufer.. Some empirical evidence for the Involvement Load Hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 51, (2002) 539-558.

  14. Jiang, N. Semantic transfer and its implications for vocabulary teaching in a second language. Modern Language Journal, (2004). 88, 416-432.

  15. Krashen, S. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal 73, (1989) 440-64. Retrieved 15 December, 2004 from JSTOR Language and Literature Collection database.

  16. Laufer, B. The lexical plight in second language reading. In J. Coady and T. Huckin, (eds.). Secondary language vocabulary acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press. (1997)

The list of used internet sites

  1. http://www.ziyonet.uz

  2. http://www.translation.org

  3. http://www.wikipedia.org

  4. http://www.ya.ru

  5. http://www.multilingual-matters.com




Download 46.24 Kb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling