Evaluation Report Publications of the Academy of Finland 1/11

B. Degrees
Table 3.2
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Master’s degree
Number of postgraduate students
Number of full-time postgraduate students
Completed doctoral degree

---

133
List of doctoral dissertations in 2005–2009 
Table 3.3
Name 
(family 
name, 
given 
name)
Year of 
birth
Gender Title of 
dissertation
Year of 
starting 
postgraduate 
studies
Year of 
completing 
degree
Years 
worked  
in the unit 
during post- 
graduate 
studies
Present 
employment 
(job description, 
organisation)
4  NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION
Throughout this section, do not use abbreviations for institutes and universities but 
spell them out. Target the collaboration and visits to the period of evaluation (2005–
2009).
More detailed content of the collaboration and important project consortia can be 
described in Part II: Collaboration.
A. Extent of collaboration
For your yearly production of refereed journal publications, give the percentages for 
co-authoring partners outside your unit.
Table 4.1
Percentage of refereed journal publications
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
No co-author outside the unit
Domestic co-author
Foreign co-author
Both domestic and foreign co-authors
B. National collaboration 
List your most important national collaborations. The collaborating organisation may 
also be from the same university or research institute, or industrial. The type of 
collaboration may be e.g. joint projects, personal collaboration, research mobility and 
networking.
The results may be: 
•  Refereed scientific publications
•  Other publications
•  Patents or other outputs
•  Educational, MSc and PhD theses 
•  Facilities, instrumentation
•  Prototypes, methodologies
•  Networks. 

---

134
Table 4.2
Main organisation and 
collaborating subunit 
Type of collaboration 
and field of science
Results
C. International collaboration
List your most important international collaborations with the same criteria as in 
Section 4.B.
Table 4.3
Main organisation and 
collaborating subunit 
Country
Type of collaboration 
and field of science
Results
D. Visits abroad 
In the following, list only senior and postdoctoral researchers of Table 2.2. Do not 
include visits by the listed persons during their postgraduate studies. Minimum 
duration of visit is one month.
Table 4.4
Name
Target organisation 
and visited subunit 
Country
Period of visit
Source of funding
In the following, list the visits abroad made by postgraduate students. Visits shorter 
than one month are not taken into account.
Table 4.5
Name
University and 
subunit 
Country
Period of visit
Source of funding
E. Visits to the unit 
Include visiting professors, visiting senior researchers and visiting postdoctoral 
researchers when the funding has not been organised through the activities of your 
unit. Minimum duration of visit is one month. Do not include visiting researchers 
from section 2. A2.
Table 4.6
Name and 
title of the 
visitor
Home 
organisation and 
visitor’s subunit
Country
Field of science 
Period of visit
Source of 
funding

---

135
In the following table, list the visits to the unit made by postgraduate students from 
other universities irrespective of the funding source. Visits shorter than one month are 
not taken into account.
Table 4.7
Name
University and 
subunit 
Country
Period of visit
Source of funding
F. Industrial collaboration 
In the following table, list only such collaboration in which senior and postdoctoral 
researchers listed in Table 2.2 have participated.
Table 4.8
Collaborating 
organisation and subunit 
Country
Type of collaboration
Results of collaboration
In the following, list cases where industrial collaboration has constituted an essential