Фарғона давлат университети ҳузуридаги илмий даражалар берувчи dsc
Review of scientific researches related to the topic of dissertation
Download 1.92 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
dunyoning lisonij tasvirida dinij-mifologik tafakkurning aks etishi
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- The aim of the research
Review of scientific researches related to the topic of dissertation. The
problem of Theolinguistics as an independent linguistic discipline has been raised in the articles by D. Crystal, E. Kucharska-Dreis and A.K. Gadomsky 1 . Studies in Theolinguistics have mainly been conducted by European and Russian scholars on the basis of the Christian religion and aimed at investigating the peculiarities of the Christian religious language and communication. In our opinion, all these research done in the field of Theolinguistics can be divided into two main directions. The first direction has been carried out in the framework of Stylistics, embracing studies of the religious style and religious genres: sermons, prayers, liturgies, religious hymns and etc 2 ; and from the position of Communicative Linguistics within which scholars study discursive characteristics of the religious language, the language of religious books, the peculiarities of clergy and believers’ language 3 . Most works, carried out in the framework of this direction are based on the texts of the Bible and other Christian literature. The second direction, which our research is based on, focuses on the study of the linguistic representation of the religious world picture. This direction in contrast to the first one is not well investigated. There are researches devoted to the study of some aspects of the relationships between language and religion done in the framework of certain linguistic fields such as Lexicology and Phraseology, Linguoculturology, Text Stylistics. The aim of the research is to work out theoretical and empirical basis of the new linguistic trend – Theolinguistics and conduct cognitive and cultural interpretation of linguistic units, representing the religious world picture in the language. 1 Crystal D. Whatever happened to Theolinguistics?// Religious language, metaphor and the mind. Paul Chilton and Monika Kopytowska (eds). –New-York: Oxford University Press, 2018. – P. 3-18; Kucharska-Dreiss E. Teolingwistyka – próba popularyzacji terminu, [w:] Język religijny dawniej i dziś, red. S. Mikołajczak, T Węcławski, Poznań, 2004. S. 23- 30; Гадомский А.К. О лакунах в системе лингвистической науки: проблема взаимодействия языка и религии // Культура народов Причерноморья. – Симферополь. – Т.1. – Вып. 49, 2004. – С. 164–166. 2 Crystal D. A liturgical language in a sociolinguistic perspective/Language and the worship of the Church/D. Jasper and R.C.D. Jasper. (eds.). – Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990. – P.120-46; Boeve L. Feyaerts K. Metaphor and God-talk. (Religions and Discourse Series. Vol 2). – Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 1999. – 291 p ; Beńkowska D. Polski styl biblijny. – Łódź: Archidiecezjalne Wydawnictwo Łódzkie, 2002. – 160 s.; Karpluk M., Sambor, J. (red.). O języku religijnym. Zagadnienia wybrane. - Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL, 1988. – 170 s.; Mistrik J. Religiozny styl//Stylistyka I. – Warszawa.: 1992. –S. 82-89; Крысин Л.П. Об одной лакуне в системе функциональных стилей современного русского языка//Русский язык в школе. – Москва. – № 3. 1994. – С. 69–79; Прохватилова О. А. Православная проповедь и молитва как феномен современной звучащей речи. – Волгоград: Издательство Волгоградского государственного университета, 1999. – 364 с. 3 Heather N. Religious language and critical discourse analysis: ideology and identity in Christian discourse today. – Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 2000. –319 p.; Noppen J.P. Transforming words: the early Methodist revival from a discourse perspective. – Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1999. – 428 p.; Bisschops R. Francis J. Metaphor, canon and community: Jewish, Christian and Islamic approaches. (Religions and Discourse Series. Vol 1). 1999. – Frankfurt: Peter Lang. – 307 p.; Alston W. P. Religious Language//The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Ed. William J. Wainwright. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. – P. 220-244; Бобырева Е.В. Религиозный дискурс: ценности, жанры, стратегии (на материале православного вероучения). Автореф.. дис. … д. ф. н.. – Волгоград, 2007. – 37 с.; Бугаева И.В. Язык православной сферы: современное состояние, тенденция развития. Автореф. дис… д. ф. н. – М., 2010. – 48 с. |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling