Foreign Language Teaching Methods and How to Choose the Best for You

Foreign Language Teaching Methods and How to Choose the Best for You
Foreign language teaching is an essential part of education that helps students acquire new skills and opens up entirely new paths of communication. However, teaching a foreign language requires careful consideration of the different methods available to ensure the most effective approach is taken. The range of language learning techniques includes ESL teaching methods that are flexible in their instruction methods, adapting them when needed. Choosing the right method that fits your students' needs and abilities is crucial. The ultimate goal is to choose the foreign language teaching methods that best fit your students, not to force them to adhere to a particular method.
Throughout history, there have been over 30 popular approaches to language learning. However, there are around ten that are most widely known, including task-based learning, the communicative approach, grammar-translation, and the audio-lingual approach. These days, the communicative approach is all the rage. The communicative approach emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of study. Language learners in environments utilizing communicative language teaching techniques learn and practice the target language through interaction with one another and the instructor. They converse about personal experiences with partners, and instructors teach topics outside of the realm of traditional grammar to promote language skills in all types of situations.
In the direct method, all teaching occurs in the target language, encouraging the learner to think in that language. The learner does not practice translation or use their native language in the classroom. Practitioners of this method believe that learners should experience a second language without any interference from their native tongue. Instructors do not stress rigid grammar rules but teach it indirectly through induction. This means that learners figure out grammar rules on their own by practicing the language. The goal for students is to develop connections between experience and language. They do this by concentrating on good pronunciation and the development of oral skills. This method improves understanding, fluency, reading, and listening skills in our students. Standard techniques are question and answer, conversation, reading aloud, writing, and student self-correction for this language learning method.
With the grammar-translation method, the student learns primarily by translating to and from the target language. Instructors encourage the learner to memorize grammar rules and vocabulary lists. There is little or no focus on speaking and listening. Teachers conduct classes in the student’s native language with this ESL teaching method. This method’s two primary goals are to progress the learner’s reading ability to understand literature in the second language and promote the learner’s overall intellectual development. Grammar drills are a common approach. Another popular activity is translation exercises that emphasize the form of the writing instead of the content. Although the grammar-translation approach was one of the most popular language teaching methods in the past, it has significant drawbacks that have caused it to fall out of favor in modern schools. Principally, students often have trouble conversing in the second language because they receive no instruction in oral skills.
Proponents of the structural approach understand language as a set of grammatical rules that should be learned one at a time in a specific order. It focuses on mastering these structures, building one skill on top of another, instead of memorizing vocabulary. This is similar to how young children learn a new language naturally. An example of the structural approach is teaching the present tense of a verb, like “to be,” before progressing to more advanced verb tenses, like the present continuous tense that uses “to be” as an auxiliary. The structural approach teaches all four central language skills: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. It’s a technique that teachers can implement with many other language teaching methods. Most ESL textbooks take this approach into account. The easier-to-grasp grammatical concepts are taught before the more difficult ones.
The suggestopedia language learning method was developed in the 1970s by psychotherapist Georgi Lozanov. It is sometimes also known as the positive suggestion method but it later became sometimes known as desuggestopedia. Apart from using physical surroundings and a good classroom atmosphere to make students feel comfortable, here are some of the main tenants of this second language teaching method: Deciphering, where the teacher introduces new grammar and vocabulary; concert sessions, where the teacher reads a text and the students follow along with music in the background. This can be both active and passive; elaboration where students finish what they’ve learned with dramas, songs, or games; introduction in which the teacher introduces new things in a playful manner; production, where students speak and interact without correction or interruption.
The functional-notional approach first of all recognizes that language is purposeful communication. The reason people talk is that they want to communicate something to someone else. Parts of speech like nouns and verbs exist to express language functions and notions. People speak to inform, agree, question, persuade, evaluate, and perform various other functions. Language is also used to talk about concepts or notions like time, events, places, etc. The role of the teacher in this second language teaching method is to evaluate how students will use the language. This will serve as a guide for what should be taught in class. Teaching a foreign language requires careful consideration of the different methods available to ensure the most effective approach is taken. Below are some of the most common foreign language teaching methods of today, as well as how to choose which ones to employ:
- Direct Method: This approach emphasizes the spoken language and centers on listening and comprehension at the beginning of the language learning process. Lessons are taught in the target language and grammar instruction isn't taught explicitly. Rather, students should learn grammar inductively. Direct method activities might include pantomiming, word-picture association, question-answer patterns, dialogues, and role-playing. The Direct Method is a foreign language teaching approach that emphasizes the spoken language and centers on listening and comprehension at the beginning of the language learning process. All teaching occurs in the target language, encouraging the learner to think in that language. The learner does not practice translation or use their native language in the classroom. Practitioners of this method believe that learners should experience a second language without any interference from their native tongue. Instructors do not stress rigid grammar rules but teach it indirectly through induction. This means that learners figure out grammar rules on their own by practicing the language. The goal for students is to develop connections between experience and language. They do this by concentrating on good pronunciation and the development of oral skills. Standard techniques are question and answer, conversation, reading aloud, writing, and student self-correction for this language learning method.
The Direct Method was first introduced in the late 19th century by Maximilian Berlitz, who believed that the most effective way to learn a language was through immersion. The Direct Method was developed as a response to the Grammar-Translation Method, which was the primary method of teaching foreign languages during that time. The Grammar-Translation Method focused on reading and writing, with little emphasis on speaking and listening skills. The Direct Method, on the other hand, emphasized oral skills and listening comprehension.
One of the primary goals of the Direct Method is to help students think in the target language. This is achieved by avoiding translation and using the target language exclusively in the classroom. The Direct Method is an immersive approach to language learning that aims to replicate the natural process of learning a language. The idea is that learners will develop an instinctive understanding of the language by being exposed to it in a natural, conversational context.
In the Direct Method, instructors do not stress rigid grammar rules but teach it indirectly through induction. Learners figure out grammar rules on their own by practicing the language. The emphasis is on communication rather than memorization. Grammar is taught inductively, with an emphasis on sentence patterns and grammatical structures. The goal is to develop the learner's ability to communicate effectively in the language, rather than to memorize grammar rules.
The Direct Method uses a variety of techniques to help learners develop their oral skills and listening comprehension. Standard techniques include question and answer, conversation, reading aloud, writing, and student self-correction. The idea is to create a natural, conversational context in which learners can practice the language. The Direct Method also emphasizes good pronunciation, as this is essential for effective communication in the language.
The Direct Method is an effective approach to language learning that has been used successfully for many years. It is particularly useful for learners who need to develop their oral skills and listening comprehension. The method is immersive and emphasizes communication over memorization. It is an excellent choice for learners who need to develop their language skills quickly and efficiently.
In conclusion, the Direct Method is a foreign language teaching approach that emphasizes the spoken language and centers on listening and comprehension at the beginning of the language learning process. All teaching occurs in the target language, encouraging the learner to think in that language. Instructors do not stress rigid grammar rules but teach it indirectly through induction. This means that learners figure out grammar rules on their own by practicing the language. The goal for students is to develop connections between experience and language. They do this by concentrating on good pronunciation and the development of oral skills. Standard techniques are question and answer, conversation, reading aloud, writing, and student self-correction for this language learning method. The Direct Method is an effective approach to language learning that has been used successfully for many years. It is particularly useful for learners who need to develop their oral skills and listening comprehension.
- Grammar-Translation Method: This method focuses on reading and writing and teaches vocabulary through translation. It is less effective for developing speaking and listening skills. The Grammar-Translation method of teaching foreign languages is one of the oldest and most traditional methods that emerged in the West. Its origins go back to the teaching of classical languages, such as Greek and Latin. The Grammar-Translation approach aims to provide students with the ability to read and translate texts in the target language. The goal is to acquire a reading knowledge of foreign languages by studying grammar and applying this knowledge to the interpretation of texts with the use of a dictionary. In addition, it has been believed that studying a foreign language provides students with good mental exercise, which helps develop their mind.
Classes using the Grammar-Translation approach are taught in the students' mother tongue with little active use of the target language. Vocabulary is taught in the form of isolated word lists, and elaborate explanations of grammar are always provided. Grammar instruction provides the rules for putting words together, and instruction often focuses on the form and inflection of words. Reading of difficult texts is begun early in the course of study, but little attention is paid to the content of texts, which are treated as exercises in grammatical analysis. Often the only drills are exercises in translating disconnected sentences from the target language into the mother tongue, and vice versa. Little or no attention is given to pronunciation.
The Grammar-Translation method has no theory behind it, and there is no literature that offers a rationale or justification for it or those attempts to relate it to issues in linguistics, psychology, or educational theory. The goal of the method has been to acquire a reading knowledge of foreign languages by studying grammar and applying this knowledge to the interpretation of texts with the use of a dictionary. The ability to communicate in the target language is not a goal. This approach aims to teach the form of the language rather than its function. For this reason, it is not an effective method for learning to speak a language fluently. Instead, it is more suited to students who are interested in reading literature or studying the language for academic purposes.
One of the main criticisms of the Grammar-Translation method is that it does not provide students with the ability to communicate in the target language. The focus on grammar rules and translation does not allow students to develop the ability to use the language in real-life situations. This method also does not emphasize listening and speaking skills, which are essential for effective communication in a foreign language. Additionally, the Grammar-Translation method is often considered boring and ineffective, as it does not engage students in active learning and does not provide opportunities for students to practice using the language in real-life situations.
Despite its limitations, the Grammar-Translation method is still being used in the 21st century, in textbooks employing a teaching model in which text is translated from the foreign language (L2) into the learner's language (L1). This is the case, for example, with the Mentor method or with Assimil's "Sans peine" series. However, it is important to note that this method is not suitable for all students or all language learning goals. The Grammar-Translation method is more suited to students who are interested in reading literature or studying the language for academic purposes. For students who want to communicate effectively in a foreign language, other methods, such as the communicative approach or task-based language learning, may be more effective.
In conclusion, the Grammar-Translation method is one of the oldest and most traditional methods for teaching foreign languages. This approach aims to provide students with the ability to read and translate texts in the target language. However, it has several limitations, including a lack of focus on communication skills, listening and speaking skills, and active learning. The Grammar-Translation method is more suited to students who are interested in reading literature or studying the language for academic purposes. For students who want to communicate effectively in a foreign language, other methods may be more effective.
- Audio-Lingual Method: This method emphasizes repetition and drills to develop speaking and listening skills. Grammar is taught inductively, with an emphasis on sentence patterns and grammatical structures. The Audio-Lingual method (ALM) is a language teaching methodology that emphasizes repetition and drills to develop speaking and listening skills. The ALM was developed during World War II, and it gained popularity in the 1950s and 1960s. The method was based on the theory that language learning is a process of habit formation and that students can learn a language by repeating patterns and drilling them until they become automatic. The ALM was widely used in the United States during the Cold War to teach critical languages such as Russian and Chinese.
One of the main features of the ALM is the emphasis on oral skills. The method assumes that learners can acquire a new language by imitating the sounds and patterns of the target language. The ALM uses dialogue-based drills to teach students how to use the language in context. The drills focus on grammatical patterns and sentence structures, and they are designed to help students develop automatic responses to common language situations.
Another feature of the ALM is the use of repetition. The method assumes that repetition is essential for learners to internalize the language patterns and structures. The ALM uses a variety of repetition techniques, such as choral repetition, individual repetition, and substitution drills. The drills are designed to help students develop accuracy and fluency in the target language.
The ALM also emphasizes error correction. The method assumes that students need to be corrected when they make mistakes in order to learn the correct language patterns. The ALM uses immediate correction techniques, such as modeling correct language use and providing feedback on errors. The method also uses delayed correction techniques, such as reviewing errors at the end of a lesson or in subsequent lessons.
Despite its popularity in the mid-20th century, the ALM has been criticized for its limitations. Critics argue that the method overemphasizes form at the expense of meaning and communicative competence. The method is also criticized for its lack of focus on reading and writing skills, which are essential for language proficiency. Furthermore, the method is criticized for its teacher-centered approach, which does not encourage learner autonomy.
In recent years, the ALM has fallen out of favor as a primary language teaching method. However, some language teachers still use the ALM in individual lessons or as a supplement to other teaching methods. Hybrid approaches have also been developed that combine the ALM with other methods, such as the communicative approach. For example, the textbook Japanese: The Spoken Language uses repetition and drills extensively but supplements them with detailed grammar explanations in English.
In conclusion, the Audio-Lingual method is a language teaching methodology that emphasizes repetition and drills to develop speaking and listening skills. While it was popular in the mid-20th century, the method has been criticized for its limitations and has fallen out of favor as a primary language teaching method. However, it is still used in some individual lessons and hybrid approaches that combine it with other methods.
- Total Physical Response Method: This method involves physical movement, such as commands or actions, to develop listening and comprehension skills. The Total Physical Response (TPR) method is a popular approach to teaching foreign languages. This method is built around the coordination of speech and action, which means teaching language through activity. TPR is an appropriate method to teach English for young learners. The teacher plays an active and direct role in teaching using TPR. The instructor is the director of a stage play in which the students are the actors. It is the teacher who decides what to teach, who models and presents the new materials, and who selects supporting materials for classroom use. The teacher is encouraged to be well-prepared and well-organized so that the lesson flows smoothly and effectively.
The TPR method is an effective teaching technique for young learners because it creates positive thinking, which facilitates the student's involvement in the learning process. It can develop not only motivation but also the aim of students in learning. Besides that, this method is very easy, and the usage of language contains action games, which is why it can help students learn fast and effectively.
TPR is based on the principle that the human brain is hard-wired to respond to physical stimuli. The method advocates the use of physical movement to aid language acquisition. The teacher gives commands in the target language, and the students respond with physical actions. The teacher models the action first, and then the students repeat it. This technique is effective because it makes the process of learning a new language more enjoyable and memorable. Students are more engaged in the learning process when they can move and interact with the language they are learning.
The TPR method is especially effective for teaching vocabulary, as it helps students to remember words more easily. The teacher introduces new vocabulary by giving commands, and the students respond with physical actions that represent the meaning of the word. For example, the teacher may say "jump," and the students jump. This technique helps students to remember the word "jump" more easily because they have associated it with a physical action. Similarly, the teacher may say "sit," and the students sit down. This technique is particularly useful for teaching young learners because it is fun and engaging.
One of the benefits of the TPR method is that it is a low-pressure technique. As students are not required to speak, they can learn at their own pace. This is particularly useful for students who are shy or self-conscious about speaking in front of others. The TPR method allows these students to participate fully in the learning process without feeling intimidated. Another advantage of the TPR method is that it is a natural method of learning. Children learn their first language through a combination of physical movement and language acquisition. The TPR method replicates this natural process, making it easier for students to learn a new language.
In conclusion, the TPR method is an effective approach to teaching young learners a foreign language. It is built around the coordination of speech and action, which means teaching language through activity. This method creates positive thinking, which facilitates the student's involvement in the learning process. The TPR method is especially effective for teaching vocabulary, as it helps students to remember words more easily. One of the benefits of the TPR method is that it is a low-pressure technique that allows students to learn at their own pace. Another advantage of the TPR method is that it is a natural method of learning, replicating the way children learn their first language.
- Task-Based Learning: This method involves learners in real-world tasks and activities. It is a student-centered approach that encourages learners to use the language in context. Task-based learning (TBL) is an approach to teaching foreign languages that revolves around the completion of meaningful tasks. In task-based learning, the main focus is the authentic use of language for genuine communication. This approach is especially popular for developing target language fluency and student confidence. Assessment is primarily based on task outcome, which is the appropriate completion of real-world tasks, rather than on the accuracy of prescribed language forms. As such, TBL can be considered a branch of communicative language teaching (CLT).
In task-based learning, students are presented with a task that they must complete using the target language. The task should be a real-world task that is relevant and meaningful to the students. For example, students might be asked to plan a trip, write a letter of complaint, or conduct an interview. The teacher's role is to guide the students through the task and provide support as needed. The teacher should also provide feedback on the students' performance and help them to reflect on what they have learned.
One of the main advantages of task-based learning is that it provides a context for language learning. By completing real-world tasks, students are exposed to the language in a meaningful way. This can help to increase their motivation and engagement with the language. Additionally, task-based learning can help to develop a range of language skills, including speaking, listening, reading, and writing. This is because tasks often require students to use a range of language skills to complete them successfully.
Another advantage of task-based learning is that it encourages students to take responsibility for their own learning. In task-based learning, students are responsible for completing the task using the target language. This means that they must take an active role in their own learning and use the language in a meaningful way. This can help to develop student autonomy and independence, which are important skills for lifelong learning.
There are several key principles that underpin task-based learning. These include:
- Authenticity: Tasks should be authentic and relevant to the students' lives. This means that they should be tasks that students might encounter in real life, such as planning a trip or writing a letter of complaint.
- Communication: The focus of task-based learning is on communication. This means that language is used to achieve a communicative goal, rather than simply to practice grammar or vocabulary.
- Learner-centeredness: Task-based learning is learner-centered, which means that the teacher's role is to facilitate learning rather than to dictate it.
- Reflection: Students should be encouraged to reflect on what they have learned and how they have learned it. This can help to develop metacognitive skills, which are important for lifelong learning.
Task-based learning can be implemented in a variety of ways, depending on the needs and abilities of the students. For example, tasks can be completed individually or in groups, and they can be completed in class or outside of class. Additionally, tasks can be designed to focus on specific language skills, such as speaking or writing.
In conclusion, task-based learning is an effective approach to teaching foreign languages that focuses on the completion of meaningful tasks. This approach provides a context for language learning and encourages students to take responsibility for their own learning. Additionally, task-based learning can help to develop a range of language skills and promote student autonomy and independence. By implementing task-based learning in the classroom, teachers can help their students to develop the language skills they need to communicate effectively in real-world situations.
When choosing a foreign language teaching method, it's essential to consider the needs and abilities of your students. The best teachers use principled eclecticism, which involves using a range of approaches at the appropriate time, for the appropriate activities, and for those students whose learning styles require that approach. The ultimate goal is to choose the foreign language teaching methods that best fit your students, not to force them to adhere to a particular method.
Traditional and Modern Foreign Language Teaching Methods
Traditional language teaching methods, such as grammar-translation, focus on discrete skills and areas of knowledge in isolation. They are strongly associated with the teaching of language used in a certain field related to the students' life or work. On the other hand, communicative language teaching (CLT), or the communicative approach, emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of study. Language learners in environments utilizing CLT techniques learn and practice the target language through the interaction with one another and the instructor. They converse about personal experiences with partners, and instructors teach topics outside of the realm of traditional grammar, in order to promote language skills in all types of situations. Foreign language teaching has seen significant changes over time, with traditional methods giving way to modern approaches that are more effective in producing the desired results. Traditional foreign language teaching methods were primarily based on a reduction of the integrated process of using a foreign language into subsets of discrete skills and areas of knowledge in isolation. These methods were strongly associated with the teaching of language used in a certain field related to the students' life or work. For example, agricultural courses included exclusively agricultural vocabulary, and all grammar was presented only in an agricultural context.
In contrast, modern foreign language teaching methods are more communicative, focusing on the real-world use of the language for genuine communication. These methods are designed to improve the foreign language ability of the student, with a focus on task-based learning, where students are presented with real-world tasks that they must complete using the target language. These tasks are authentic, relevant to the students' lives, and require the use of a range of language skills, including speaking, listening, reading, and writing.
One of the most popular modern foreign language teaching methods is the communicative approach. This approach emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of study. Language learners in environments utilizing communicative language teaching techniques learn and practice the target language through interaction with one another and the instructor. They converse about personal experiences with partners, and instructors teach topics outside of the realm of traditional grammar to promote language skills in all types of situations.
Another modern foreign language teaching method is the task-based learning approach. This approach revolves around the completion of meaningful tasks that require the use of the target language. The tasks should be a real-world task that is relevant and meaningful to the students. For example, students might be asked to plan a trip, write a letter of complaint, or conduct an interview. The teacher's role is to guide the students through the task and provide support as needed. The teacher should also provide feedback on the students' performance and help them to reflect on what they have learned.
The direct method is another modern foreign language teaching method that is very popular. All teaching occurs in the target language, encouraging the learner to think in that language. The learner does not practice translation or use their native language in the classroom. Practitioners of this method believe that learners should experience a second language without any interference from their native tongue. Instructors do not stress rigid grammar rules but teach it indirectly through induction. This means that learners figure out grammar rules on their own by practicing the language. The goal for students is to develop connections between experience and language. They do this by concentrating on good pronunciation and the development of oral skills.
The audio-lingual approach is another modern foreign language teaching method that emphasizes the development of listening and speaking skills. This approach is based on the behaviorist theory of learning, which suggests that language learning is a matter of habit formation. Therefore, the audio-lingual method is characterized by the use of drills, repetition, and memorization. The focus is on the development of automatic responses to the language, rather than on the conscious learning of grammar rules and vocabulary.
In conclusion, traditional foreign language teaching methods have given way to modern approaches that are more communicative and effective in producing the desired results. The communicative approach, task-based learning, the direct method, and the audio-lingual approach are just a few examples of modern foreign language teaching methods that are popular today. By understanding the history of foreign language teaching and the different methods available, teachers can choose the best method for their students at any given moment.
How to Keep Balance Between Traditional and Communicative Language Teaching Method?
To keep the balance between traditional and communicative language teaching methods, it's essential to take advantages of both methods and avoid their negative sides. A good language teacher should give deep and broad knowledge on the given topic, and then use multimedia technology to make the lesson more interesting and effective. The teacher should also make activities that are very useful for students. However, one thing that must be clear is that human and face-to-face teaching cannot be replaced with other additional items. Teachers who are highly experienced are an essential part of the education system. Balancing traditional and communicative language teaching methods can be challenging for teachers. While traditional methods focus on the rules of grammar and vocabulary, communicative teaching methods prioritize real-world communication. However, both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages, and finding a balance between them can lead to effective language learning.
One way to balance traditional and communicative language teaching methods is to incorporate elements of both into lessons. For example, teachers can use traditional methods to teach grammar and structure, while incorporating communicative activities to practice real-world communication. This can involve using role-plays, discussions, and debates to encourage students to use the language in a meaningful way. By combining traditional and communicative methods, teachers can help their students develop both the knowledge and skills they need to communicate effectively in the target language.
Another way to balance traditional and communicative language teaching methods is to use a task-based approach. In task-based learning, students are presented with a task that they must complete using the target language. The task should be a real-world task that is relevant and meaningful to the students. For example, students might be asked to plan a trip, write a letter of complaint, or conduct an interview. The teacher's role is to guide the students through the task and provide support as needed. The teacher should also provide feedback on the students' performance and help them to reflect on what they have learned. This approach can help to balance traditional and communicative methods by providing a context for language learning while also encouraging students to use the language in a meaningful way.
Another approach to balancing traditional and communicative language teaching methods is to use a flipped classroom model. In a flipped classroom, students learn the rules of grammar and vocabulary outside of class, through online resources or textbooks. This allows teachers to focus on communicative activities during class time, such as role-plays, discussions, and debates. By flipping the classroom, teachers can provide students with the knowledge they need to communicate effectively while also encouraging them to use the language in a real-world context.
In conclusion, balancing traditional and communicative language teaching methods can be challenging, but it is possible. By incorporating elements of both into lessons, using task-based learning, or flipping the classroom, teachers can help their students develop both the knowledge and skills they need to communicate effectively in the target language. By finding a balance between traditional and communicative methods, teachers can ensure that their students are well-equipped to succeed in the real world.
To sum up, foreign language teaching methods vary and each method has its advantages and disadvantages. When choosing a method, it's essential to consider the needs and abilities of your students and to use different approaches at the appropriate time and for the appropriate activities. The ultimate goal is to choose the foreign language teaching methods that best fit your students, not to force them to adhere to a particular method. To keep the balance between traditional and communicative language teaching methods, it's essential to take advantages of both methods and avoid their negative sides.

References

1. 
   https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273852128_Using_Total_Physical_Response_Method_in_Early_Childhood_Foreign_Language_Teaching_Environments
   
2. 
   https://febrieltm.wordpress.com/2014/07/01/the-use-of-total-physical-response-method-in-teaching-english-as-a-second-language-for-young-learners/
   
3. 
   https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/traditional-and-modern-foreign-language-teaching-methods
   
4. 
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicative_language_teaching