H eidelberg I nstitute for I nternational
Dynamics within individual conflicts
Download 2.01 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- Change of intensity Number
- Conflict Items
- Global Frequency of Conflict Items in 2010 by Intensity Groups
- Coups d’ ´etat
- Coups d’ ´ Etat and Attempted Coups d’ ´ Etat 1945 to 2010
- Measures of Conflict Resolution Negotiations and Treaties
Dynamics within individual conflicts As in the past years, approx. two thirds of all conflicts, i.e. 257 out of 363, remained on the same level of in- tensity from 2009 to 2010. While a total of 54 conflicts deescalated by at least one level of intensity, 48 conflicts escalated. Among the escalating cases, 31 crossed the threshold to violence: Most of them, i.e. 26 cases, es- calated by one level from manifest conflicts to crises, in- cluding the interstate conflict between the USA and Pak- istan [
→ USA - Pakistan]. The remaining five conflicts escalated by two levels. Four escalated from latent con- flicts to crises, among them the confrontations between the Islamic opposition and the government in Tadjikistan [ → Tadjikistan (opposition)] and the territorial conflict be- tween Thailand and Myanmar mentioned above. One escalated from a manifest conflict to a severe crisis: In Kyrgyzstan, tensions between ethnic Kyrgyz and ethnic Uzbeks resulted in clashes and ethnic cleansing, leaving an estimated 400 to 2,000 people, most of them ethnic Uzbeks, dead [ → Kyrgyzstan (Uzbeks - Kyrgyz)]. Change of intensity Number Escalation by four levels 0 Escalation by three levels 0 Escalation by two levels 5 Escalation by one level 43 No change 257 Deescalation by one level 51 Deescalation by two levels 2 Deescalation by three levels 1 Deescalation by four levels 0 In contrast to the escalating cases, 54 conflicts deesca- lated. Thereby, 23 cases went from a violent to a non- violent level. Two of them deescalated by two levels, each from a crisis to a latent conflict, and one by three: Last year’s war in Sri Lanka deescalated to a manifest conflict, as 2009 had seen the military defeat of the LTTE in Sri Lanka [ → Sri Lanka (LTTE/northern and eastern Sri Lanka)]. Conflict Items As in previous years, the most frequent conflict item was system/ideology with 117 cases. This item sig- nifies that the respective conflicts were conducted in order to change the political or economic system, e.g. striving for democracy in an authoritarian state, seek- ing theocracy as opposed to a secular state, or aiming for a socialist economic order, or concerned other ide- ological or religious differences. As in the years before, resources ranked second with 80 cases, closely followed by national power with 75 cases. As conflicts very often involved more than one item, many conflicts featured in this analysis two or more times. Common combina- tions were national power and system/ideology, national power and resources, territory and resources, regional predominance and resources, autonomy and resources, international power and territory, as well as international power and system/ideology. The three most frequent items were all quite prone to violence with more than half of the system/ideology as well as the national power conflicts being fought out with the use of sporadic or even massive violence. Resource conflicts were vio- lent in 44 percent of the cases. Nevertheless, the item most prone to violence was secession with two thirds of the cases being conducted violently. Regional pre- dominance ranked second with 58 percent, closely fol- lowed by system/ideology.Concerning the frequency of the items, there were remarkable differences between the various world regions, indicating varying regional patterns of conflict. 4 Conflict Barometer 2010 Global Frequency of Conflict Items in 2010 by Intensity Groups low Intensity medium Intensity high Intensity 50 18
50 34 25 34 45 20 8 29 15 51 34 27 5 29 5 7 1 16 7 12 6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
110 120
130 140
frequency terr
itor y secession decolonisation autonom
y system/ideology national po w er regional
predomi- nance
inter national
po w er resources other
In Europe, the prevalent item was secession with 19 cases, followed by autonomy and system/ideology with 15 each. This high share of self-determination con- flicts was unique among the regions. In addition, Eu- rope had a relatively high number of cases featuring ter- ritory (12 cases) or international power (11 cases), indi- cating a comparatively large share of interstate conflicts. In contrast, resources as well as national power were contested in only six cases each, and regional predom- inance in just one single case. As opposed to this, re- sources with 32 cases, regional predominance with 27 and national power with 25 cases were the prevalent items in Sub-Saharan Africa. As these items were prone to violence, the first item might be seen as an indication of the ambiguous role of abundant resources, the latter two as indications of defective statehood. In the Amer- icas, Asia and Oceania as well as the Middle East and Maghreb, system/ideology was the prevalent item with 21 out of 45 conflicts featuring this item in the Americas, 39 out of 114 in Asia and Oceania, and even 33 out of 55 in the Middle East and Maghreb. Nevertheless, while re- sources ranked equal with system/ideology in the Amer- icas, they were of minor importance in Asia and Oceania with 14 cases and in the Middle East and Maghreb with seven. In addition, regional predominance ranked sec- ond in Asia and Oceania with 23 cases, while ranking fifth in the Middle East and Maghreb with six cases. Coups d’ ´etat After last year’s six attempted or successful coups d’ ´etat, five failed or successful attempts to overthrow the gov- ernment were observed in 2010. Except for one in Asia and Oceania, all of them were observed in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Niger, military forces led by Colonel Salou Djibo toppled President Madaou Tandja on February 18 [ → Niger (opposition)]. Two coup attempts, on April 18 and November 17, respectively, were staged in Mada- gascar against President Andry Rajoelina, who himself had taken power in a military-backed coup in March 2009 [ →
nessed the fourth coup attempt in three years, when military forces arrested the army chief as well as Prime Minister Carlos Gomes Junior on April 1. However, the civilian government was reinstated the same day [ → Guinea-Bissau (coup plotters)]. Asia’s coup attempt was staged in Kyrgyzstan, where government forces clashed with some 2,000 supporters of Urmat Baryktobasov, a former presidential candidate and businessman near the capital, Bishkek, on August 6. Baryktobasov had returned from exile some days earlier and, according to the government, demanded to be named prime minister. Riot police and army dispersed the demonstration using tear gas and firing in the air, while the government con- firmed Baryktobasov had been arrested.
Coups d’ ´ Etat ........... ........... ........... ............... ......
...... ......
....... ......
...... .......
...... ......
...... ......
.................. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................. ......
...... ......
.............. ..................... ................................................. ......
...... ......
...... .................. ........... ............. ...... ......
...... ........
........ .......
...... ......
...... ......
...... .......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ............ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... .......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
............ ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ....... ......
...... ................ ........... ............ ........... ................... ...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... .................. ........... ............. ...... ......
...... ......
...... ......... ................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .................. ......
...... ......
...... .......
...... ......
...... ......
....... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... .............. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ......... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
.................. ........... ........... ........... ....................... ......
................ ............. ................... ................. ........... ........... ............... ......
...... ......
....... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...... ........................ ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ........... ............ ........... ........... ........... ........... ..................... ...... ......
...... ......
...... ......
...................... ........... ........... ............. ............. ......
...... ......
............................. ......................... ...... ......
...... .......
...... ......
...... ..................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............. ............. ........... ............. ...... ......
....... ......
...... ......
................... 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 n umber of coups 1945 1950
1955 1960
1965 1970
1975 1980
1985 1990
1995 2000
2005 2010
In addition to the coups or coup attempts mentioned above, governments in various countries accused civil or military oppositional forces of plotting coups. In Bu- rundi, eighteen soldiers were arrested in late January, on charges of planning to stage a mutiny and coup. On February 6, two other soldiers attacked an army base where the detainees had initially been held, killing one sentinel. Opposition parties dismissed the alleged plot as a government attempt to create a pretext for a crack-down on the opposition [ → Burundi (opposi- tion)]. In Niger, on October 16, coup leader Djibo ar- rested two officers on charges of plotting to overthrow him. In Panama, on January 17, police forces arrested two members of the presidential guard and a Puerto Ri- can national accused of plotting to kidnap President Ri- cardo Martinelli. In Ecuador, President Rafael Correa was attacked with teargas by police officers protesting against austerity measures. He was treated in a nearby police hospital. Correa accused the police of an at- tempted coup d’ ´etat and declared a state of emergency on September 30, while unrest flared up throughout the country. Altogether, five people were killed, among them two police officers, and 16 injured before the situation calmed down. The national police chief resigned two days after the attack. In Turkey, on January 20, a news- paper published parts of an alleged 2003 plan for a mil- itary coup called ”Balyoz”. The plan comprised assaults on mosques as well as a Turkish fighter jet being shot down over the Aegean Sea in order to stir unrest. On February 22, 49 officers were arrested and charged with attempting to overthrow the government. The defen- dants denied the accusations, stating the plan had been part of a planning exercise at a military seminar.
Global Conflict Panorama 5
Also in 2010, terrorist attacks played an important part in the conduct of conflicts in all regions. As terrorist mea- sures were employed for various goals, differing patterns could be observed. Firstly, terrorist attacks were com- mitted by domestic actors aiming for self-determination, national power, or to change the political system. For in- stance, the Real Irish Republican Army and the ´ Oglaigh
na h ´ Eireann in Northern Ireland [ → United Kingdom (Na- tionalists/Northern Ireland)] and the Euskadi Ta Askata- suna in Spain [ → Spain (ETA, PNV/Basque Provinces)] continued their fights for secession, although the latter showed willingness to turn to a diplomatic path in the second half of 2010. In the Russian North Caucasus, Islamist terrorism aimed at the establishment of an in- dependent Caucasian Emirate, shifted its field of action further and was marked by an increase of suicide bomb- ings [ →
second pattern referred to actors committing terrorist as- saults not only in their respective home country, but also abroad. For instance, Greek leftwing militants not only staged a series of bomb attacks in Greece, but also were responsible for a series of mail bombings against Eu- ropean and South American official persons and build- ings [ →
transnational terrorism in 2010 could again be assigned to militant Islamist groups. The Somali Al-Shabaab not only conducted attacks in Somalia, but also claimed re- sponsibility for two simultaneous bomb attacks in the Ugandan capital Kampala on July 11, killing more than 80 people [ → Somalia (Islamist groups)]. Furthermore, the transnational terrorist network al-Qaeda and its af- filiated groups were still a major security threat to many countries. The conflict between Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) and the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), on the one hand, and the government, on the other, remained a severe crisis in which suicide bombings were a key means of both militant groups [ → Iraq (AQI, ISI)]. While no further vi- olent measures by Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), formed by merger in 2009, were reported for Saudi Arabia [ → Saudi Arabia (AQAP)], the conflict be- tween AQAP and the Yemeni government turned highly violent, mainly due to AQAP’s involvement in a failed ter- rorist attack on the US by a Nigerian citizen on 12/25/09. The young man tried to detonate a bomb on a flight with 280 passengers from Amsterdam as it came into land in Detroit. Additionally, a suicide bomber attempted to kill the British ambassador to Yemen on April 27. AQAP in Yemen also claimed responsibility for mail bombs ad- dressed to synagogues in Detroit, USA, which had been intercepted at airports in Dubai and Great Britain [ → Yemen (AQAP)]. The Algeria-based Al-Qaeda in the Is- lamic Maghreb (AQIM) continued to be active in sev- eral countries in 2010 [ → Algeria (AQIM); Mauritania (AQIM); Mali (AQIM)]. Additionally, the Abdullah Azzam Brigades, an al-Qaeda linked militant group, damaged a Japanese oil tanker by an explosion in the Strait of Hor- muz on July 28. Throughout the year, links between dif- ferent militant Islamist groups were constantly reported, e.g. between AQIM, Somali al-Shabaab and Nigerian Boko Haram [ → Nigeria (Boko Haram)]. Furthermore, a car bomb attack on New York’s Times Square was foiled by the US police on May 1. The al- leged bomb planter, a US citizen of Pakistani origin, was arrested three days later when trying to leave the USA. In addition, several further suspects were detained in Pak- istan, as Pakistani Taliban were supposed to be behind the attack [ → Pakistan (various Islamist militants)]. Due to repeated terror threats and defeated attempts, most countries of the Global North intensified their se- curity arrangements. On March 4, a German court sen- tenced four alleged members of the Islamic Jihad Union, a group linked to al-Qaeda, to prison terms ranging from five to twelve years. In mid-March, an Irish court pressed charges against two suspected Islamist militants in con- nection to an alleged plot to murder a Swedish car- toonist involved in the 2007 Muhammad cartoons. On May 10, eight Islamist militants were convicted to an eight-year prison term by a Belgian court for leading a group that recruited militants to fight in Afghanistan. On August 9, German police closed down the Hamburg mosque where the 9/11 plotters had met before carry- ing out their suicide attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001. On September 16, France raised its terror alert to the second highest level. In early October, the US, the UK, Sweden and Japan issued travel warnings concern- ing travelling in Europe after the US State Department had warned of possible al-Qaeda attacks, especially in France, Germany and the UK. France arrested 17 peo- ple on terrorism charges in October and November. On November 17, Germany tightened its security measures at railway stations and airports in response to concrete indications of possible attacks in late November.
In at least 54 of the current 363 conflicts, some or all of the conflict parties met in order to hold talks, ne- gotiations, or conferences. Altogether, the number of successful and unsuccessful talks amounted to at least 164. Among these, at least 19 rounds of talks were held in severe crises or wars, 73 in conflicts marked by the sporadic use of violence, and 72 in non-violent conflicts. With 130, the majority of these talks did not result in the conclusion of a formal agreement. For example, despite numerous rounds of negotiations, Flemish and Walloon parties in Belgium could neither agree on a state reform nor on the formation of a government coalition [ → Bel- gium (Flemish parties/Flanders)]. In Cyprus, dozens of UN-led reunification negotiations between the presidents of the de-facto Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus and the government of the Republic of Cyprus, respectively, did not lead to a breakthrough. In Israel, US-mediated proximity talks between the Is- raeli government and the Palestinian National Authority were resumed after a stalemate in negotiations of 17 months. However, the conflict parties failed to reach an agreement. In the inter-state crisis between Pakistan and India, Indian Foreign Minister Somanahalli Malla-
6 Conflict Barometer 2010 iah Krishna and his Pakistani counterpart Makhdoom Shah Mehmood Quereshi met on July 15. However, the talks ended without the conclusion of any binding agree- ments.
Download 2.01 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling