“ххi асрда илм-фан тарақҚиётининг ривожланиш истиқболлари ва уларда инновацияларнинг тутган ўрни” мавзусидаги республика илмий-online конференцияси материаллари

“ХХI АСРДА ИЛМ-ФАН ТАРАҚҚИЁТИНИНГ РИВОЖЛАНИШ ИСТИҚБОЛЛАРИ ВА УЛАРДА ИННОВАЦИЯЛАРНИНГ 
ТУТГАН ЎРНИ” МАВЗУСИДАГИ РЕСПУБЛИКА ИЛМИЙ-ONLINE КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯСИ МАТЕРИАЛЛАРИ 
99 
ИҚТИСОДИЁТДА ИННОВАЦИЯЛАРНИНГ ТУТГАН ЎРНИ 
 
INNOVATIVE AND INVESTMENT AСTIVITY IN BUSINESS 
Akramova Nargiza, Assistant of TIIAME 
Annotation:
 This article discusses investment as one of the key factors affecting on socio - 
economic development of full-macroeconomic system. In the process of modernization of the 
economy, the process of forming an effective investment development mechanism is not only a
problem of the separate regions, spheres and branches, but also the impact of the existing
disproportions in the process of formulating an effective investment policy. 
Key 
words: 
economics, 
innovation, 
modernization, 
reforms, 
microeconomics, 
macroeconomics. 
One of the major obstacles to the development of the regions of our country is
the 
insufficient investment in the real sector of the economy of the region. The investment 
attractiveness of the regions
serves as the basis for the development of
investment politics. It 
should be noted
that, today, the investment attractiveness
of the regions of the country is 
considerably lower. Our research has s hown
that the methodology for assessing investment 
attractiveness of the regions of the
country is insufficiently developed and
requires improvement. 
That’s why the
question of determining the sources of
investment attractiveness of the regions
and 
identifying the sources of its development is both practical and theoretically
questions. During our research, we studied the
experience of foreign countries in classifying 
factors affecting investment attraction, and we have proposed the following
classifications of 
aggregate factors that
affect the investment attractiveness of the
region:
Our research consisted of 
such factors
as regional investment capacity, area production efficiency, development of small
and
private business, consumer level and
quality of life and regional investment
nourishment and 
includes 50 private indicators. These particular indicators are
characterized by the fact that the 
areas under review are in the socio-economic,
legal, ecological and other spheres of development, 
which have some effect on the
investment 
attractiveness of the region.
The statistical data of the selected private
indicators are 
reflected in different dimensions and at the next stage of the research; these indicators were 
converted
from absolute values to the single measurement unit. The statistical information
of 
chosen private indicators are shown in
different dimensions and in further stages
of the research 
this indicators are converted from absolute price into united
dimension system. The investment 
potential and the total potential risk and risk
weight of each type of risk can be varied
depending on 
the investor’s wishes. We
would like to rate the results of 1 to
4 groups of indicators, 
which have a positive impact on investment attractiveness,
in order to reduce complex 
indicators of
regions. The first place is assigned to the
region with the highest value of the complex 
indicator. Based on the results of the
five groups rating, which reflects the negative impact on 
investment attractiveness,
we place the value of the result in the order of growth. The first place is 
assigned
to the region with the highest value of the
complex indicator. The methodology for
evaluating investment attractiveness of
the proposed regions has a number of
peculiarities, in