© Travel UCD Limited 2003. All Rights Reserved.
Hotel booking process design & usability
Travel UCD – February 2003
For a user who wishes
to evaluate different rooms, rates and hotels, style B is significantly
preferable.
In the usability testing (summarised in the Appendix) we observed that all 12
users on the
Expedia website (style B) successfully evaluated different rooms, rates and hotels for known
dates in a specified city. The same users were not as successful at
evaluating different hotel
options on the Opodo website (style A).
Notes on style A
• Websites that implement style A should ensure that users can identify which hotels they
have viewed the rooms and rates on (e.g. change the colour of visited hyperlinks).
Notes on style B
• Enables a user to quickly arrive at an ‘overview’ price for a city, for a specific date
• The user can evaluate between an expensive
room in a cheap hotel, and a cheap room in
an expensive hotel, without significant forwards and
backward screen navigation
• In our usability testing, we observed that users evaluated more hotels (checking for
required rooms or rates) on a style B website (Expedia) than on a style A website
(Opodo).
Style A or B is irrelevant if the user knows the name of the hotel they are looking for because
they do not need to complete an ‘evaluation’ activity.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: