International Relations. A self-Study Guide to Theory


Download 0.79 Mb.
Pdf ko'rish
bet75/111
Sana03.02.2023
Hajmi0.79 Mb.
#1149350
1   ...   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   ...   111
Bog'liq
International Relations (Theory)

Approach to 
„levels of analysis“ 
• System 
level 
Philosophy of science 
• Positivism 
Normative perspective 
• Cooperation and institution-building desirable be-
cause of collectively useful political outcomes (win-
win solutions in security, welfare, environment etc.) 
• Optimism and belief in progress. Civilization of in-
ternational politics through institutionalization. 
• Transformation of anarchy: anarchy becomes “regu-
lated anarchy”. 
Theory and practice/role of 
the scientist
• Social scientists provide objective knowledge about 
international politics.
• Objective knowledge used for policy recommenda-
tion: politics of interdependence, multilateralism and 
international cooperation. 
Review questions 
1. Compare the assumptions made in neorealist and neoinstitutionalist theo-
ry. Reflect on reasons for commonalities and differences.
2. What is the core question of the neoinstitutionalist research program? 
Compare it to that of neorealist theory. 
3. Explain “interdependence” a) as a real-world phenomenon of internation-
al politics and b) as an analytical concept. What function does interde-
pendence as an analytical concept have in the neoinstitutionalist model of 
explanation? 
4. Outline the neoinstitutionalist explanation of international politics. 


156 
Step 4: 
Final self-study and consolidation 
 
Self-study (3)
Try to explain the increasing number and scope of international organiza-
tions in the 20th and 21st century from a neoinstitutionalist point of view. 
Self-study (4) 
What kind of policy advice for the practice of international politics would 
be given from a neoinstitutionalist perspective? Discuss against the back-
ground of the positivist claim to provide “objective knowledge”. 
Required readings 
Keohane, Robert O./Nye, Joseph 2001 (1977): Power and Interdependence. World Politics 
in Transition. 3
rd
. ed. New York: Longman, chapters 1,2,3. 
Keohane, Robert O. (1984): After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Polit-
ical Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, chapters 4,5,6. 
Hasenclever/Mayer/Rittberger 1997: Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: Cam-
bridge University Press, chapters 4 and 5. 
Hall, Peter/Taylor, Rosemary 1996: Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, 
in: Political Studies 44: 5, 936-957. 
Supplementary readings 
Axelrod, Robert 1984: The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books. 
Baldwin, David (ed.) 1993: Neorealism and Neoliberalism. The contemporary debate. New 
York: Columbia University Press 
Keohane, Robert O. 1986a: Realism, Neorealism and the Study of World Politics, in: Keo-
hane, Robert O. (ed.): Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University 
Press, 1-26. 
Keohane, Robert O. 1986b: Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond, in: 
Keohane, Robert O. (ed.): Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University 
Press, 158-203. 
Keohane, Robert O. (ed.) 1986: Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia Universi-
ty Press 
Koremos, Barbara/Lipson, Charles/Snidal, Duncan 2001: The Rational Design of Interna-
tional Institutions. 
Spindler, Manuela 2013: Interdependence, in Schieder, Siegfried/Spindler, Manuela (eds.): 
Theories of International Relations. London and New York: Routledge (forthcoming). 


157 
References in the text 
Di Maggio/Powell (eds.) 1991: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chi-
cago: University of Chicago Press
Friedrich, C.J. 1968 Trends of federalism in theory and practice, New York: Praeger 
Hall/Taylor 1996: Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, in: Political Stud-
ies 44: 5, 936-957 
Meyer, John W.; Rowan Brian (1977), Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as 
Myth and Ceremony, in: American Journal of Sociology, 83: 2, 341-361. 
North, Douglas C. 1990: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. 
Cambridge: CUP. 
North, Douglas, C.; Thomas, Robert P. 1973: The Rise of the Western World: A New Eco-
nomic History, Cambridge. 
Scott, Richard W. 2001. Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pub-
lications 


158 
7.
New liberal theory
Learning steps 
Introduction ......................................................................................................... 
159 
Step 1: 
New liberalism as a “positive” IR theory: assumptions about actors 
and structures .................................................................................................. 
161 
1.1. 
Assumptions about social actors ............................................................ 
162 
1.2. 
Assumptions about domestic structures: the state as a “representative 
institution” .............................................................................................. 
163 
1.3. 
Assumptions about the nature of the international system ..................... 
164 
Step 2: 
New liberalism as a general theoretical approach to IR ........................ 
167 
2.1. 
The new liberal explanation and prediction ........................................... 
167 
2.2. 
Levels of analysis: the logic of two-level-games ................................... 
169 
2.3. 
New liberalism as a contribution to multi-causal analysis ..................... 
170 
Step 3: 
Check your understanding: key aspects and review questions ............... 
171 
Step 4: 
Final self-study and consolidation .............................................................. 
172 


159 
Introduction 
Following our criteria for a structured learning process for theoretical ap-
proaches to IR, this unit will introduce you to the third approach presented in 
Download 0.79 Mb.

Do'stlaringiz bilan baham:
1   ...   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   ...   111




Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling