World-systems analysis
Core question
•
What does historical social science as a form of analy-
sis contribute to the transformation of social reality?
Ontological assumptions
about actors and structure
•
The “historical social system” as the basic unit of the
social world
•
The whole (system) is ontologically prior to its parts
(ontological holism)
•
The social whole is not reducible to its constituent
elements (ontological and methodological holism)
•
Unity of the spheres of social life (politics, econom-
ics, society)
“Agency and structure”
•
Ontological priority of structure (ontological holism)
•
Social structures are ontologically independent of
the actions
•
Agents (persons, identity groups, states, and class
agents) act according to the single logic of the sys-
tem, they are determined by structure. Agency is ex-
plained in terms of the “whole” (methodological ho-
lism)
•
Agency only in the transition phase from one histori-
cal system to another: historical choices. Here, hu-
man actions are crucial for the transformation of
structures
Nature of explanation and
causality
•
Explanation is structuralist/holistic, constitutive form
of causality
•
Structuralist/holistic explanation: structures (the
whole) are generative (explanation NOT in terms of
the properties of individuals or their relations). Struc-
tures constitute or generate actors (e.g. the state,
classes, identity groups)
•
Actors/actions are explained in relation to the world-
system as a whole (methodological holism)
Approach to “levels of
analysis”
•
No “level of analysis” (concept is not applicable be-
cause positivism is rejected)
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |