Interpretation of literary

car better or a Black child say Some of them be big and some of them 
be small, though he has no trouble understanding either sentence, he 
makes a mental note of the grammar. On the other hand our American is 
delighted with the attractive French Lady's remark to her companion, as 
he passes them and favours her with a stare, Pour qui se prend il uttered 
with; a returning stare. He understands no French. 

---

61 
In all these instances these floats, along with the meanings of the 
words, the answer to a hidden question: Who is doing the talking?
1
The perception of an imaginative production which is a 
determining factor in the achievement of pragmatic effect adequate pos-
sesses a double character. It is estimated, first of all, according to the 
content expressed by it, comprehension of the main idea, conditioned by 
the system of images in the production on as a whole and representing 
by itself an objective category. Realization of this general idea by each 
concrete addressee transfers the objective understanding of the literary 
text content into subjective-personal sense. The above stated thought is 
confirmed by the doctrine of Marxist aesthetics about the subjective-
objective nature of the aesthetic sphere, of which literature forms a part. 
In contradistinction to the so called rational type of cognizing the 
world, the aesthetic perception is always conditioned by a situation, 
since the real attitude of the man to the fragment of reality, reflected in 
the imaginative production, embraces not the whole object but only 
vitally important for the given person sense of information - in 
accordance with his aims, needs and expectations. As a result an 
imaginative production serves for the reader as an analogue, while 
creating new content, but not as an object of cognition. 
At the same time the personal character of perception is also 
socially determined, because the expectation of a definite reaction is 
socially conditioned by literary, ethical cultural stereotypes bo th national 
and even above—national, as well as social, regional and representing 
small groups. 
The main means of literary communication with the help of which 
a speech agent realizes his ideologycal and artistic scheme and effects 
aesthetic impact upon the reader is a text. The task of a text creator is to 
achieve such harmony, so that each element of artistic structure should 
be maximally effective or using linguop-ragmatic terms "maximally 
appropriate". 
The task of an interpreter is to "decode" the content of the text by 
comprehending its whole ideo-aesthetic system and each element of the 
system in their interconnection, This rather complex activity 
unquestionably requires a creative approach and it is based, on one 
side, on wielding—to this or that extent—an apparatus of 
linguostylistic analysis, and on the other side, on the acquaintance—
again in greater or less measure—with the factors of cultural 

---

62 
context"—a complex of ideological, social, national, literary and 
personal circumstances of creating a speech production. 
•SUMMARY