Introduction to management
Download 1.62 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
menejment
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- Corporate Rating Approach
- 13.11 OBSTACLES TO SOCIAL AUDIT
- 13.12 SOCIAL AUDIT IN INDIA
- 13.14 SELF-TEST QUESTIONS
- 13.15 SUGGESTED READINGS
- COURSE: MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR COURSE CODE: MC-101 AUTHOR: SURINDER SINGH
- 14.3 CONTROLLING AND OTHER FUNCTIONS
- Figure 14.1: Planning and controlling relationships
- 14.3 IMPORTANCE OF CONTROL
Partial Social Audit: Partial social audit evaluates any particular aspects
of social performance like energy conservation or ecological preservation. (vi) Comprehensive Audit: Comprehensive audit attempts to evaluate the total performance of the organisation including social performance. (vii) Corporate Rating Approach: In contradistinction to the audits mentioned above, this is an external evaluation of the company's performance by public groups like consumer organisations, social welfare organisations or media. The format of social reporting used by the Cement Corporation of India is given below.
420
Social audit encounters a number of problems. The important obstacles are: 1. Being a relatively new concept, social audit is yet to gain wide appreciation and acceptance.
Being a relatively new concept, a clear and generally well accepted methodology for conducting the social audits is not available.
There is no agreement as to the items to be included for social audit. 4. It is very difficult, and in several cases even impossible, to quantify the social costs and benefits of different activities or items.
There may be resistance within the company to social audit because of the time, effort, and difficulty involved in the task.
There may also be resistance because of the fear of a dismal or unsatisfactory picture that may be presented by the social audit. As the Committee set up by the Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited (TISCO) to conduct the Social Audit of the TISCO points out, though social audits have been undertaken in a number of countries, principally in the U.S.A. (to which the practice owes its origin), Japan, the U.K. and one or two other Western countries, the subject has not yet attained the status of a science. There is no agreement, much less unanimity, among its most ardent proponents, particularly as to its basic principles or its true objectives. It is only a child of the last decade, during which there has been a growing concern about the environment and the problems of pollution, consumer protection, worker’s safety -and equal employment opportunities. Melvin Anshen, Professor of Public Policy and Business Responsibility at the Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, and an eminent authority on the subject, remarks that "the social audit has been described as an idea whose time has come but which isn't ready to be taken off the drawing board and put to work".
Although, the idea of social audit originated in the United States about half a century ago, it is only recently that it received serious attention of corporations even in the advance countries. The first comprehensive social audit in India was conducted by the TISCO in 1980. It was conducted by the Social Audit
421
Committee appointed by the Board of Directors of the company "to examine and report whether, and the extent to which, the company has fulfilled the objectives contained in Clause 3A of its Articles of Association regarding its social and moral responsibilities to the consumers, employees, shareholders, society and the local community." The report of the Committee was a glowing tribute to the endeavours of the company in the discharge of its social and moral obligations to the various segments of the society. Some companies like the Cement Corporation of India have been making some social reporting in their annual reports. The High Powered Expert Committee on Companies and MRTP Acts (Sachar Committee) observes that the acceptance of the concept of social responsibility must be reflected in the information and disclosures that the company makes available for the benefit of its various constituents - shareholders, creditors, workers and the community and has suggested that a provision may be made in the Companies Act that every company shall give a social report which will indicate and quantify, in as precise and clear terms as possible, the various activities relating to social responsibility which have been carried out by the company in the previous year. The Committee has further suggested that it is possible that a company may be required to alter its Memorandum with respect to the objects of the company so as to carry out its activities as an obligation to the concept of social responsibility. It should be pointed out here that the TISCO had, in 1970, voluntarily incorporated in its Articles "of Association it’s social and "moral responsibilities to the consumers, employees, shareholders, society and the local people. The concept of social audit has not yet taken off in India.
The rationale of the concept of social responsibility is that industry "can no longer be regarded as a private arrangement for enriching shareholders. It has become a joint enterprise in which workers, management, consumers, the locality, Government and trade union officials all playa part. If the system which we know by the name private enterprise is to continue, some way must be found to embrace many interests who go to make up industry in a common purpose." It is argued that a company has a number of social responsibilities to the employees, 422
shareholders, consumers and the community. Social responsibility of business is advocated on the ground that the resources it makes use of are not limited to those of the proprietors and the impact of their operations is felt also by many a people who are in no way connected with the enterprises. The shareholders, the suppliers of resources, the consumers, the local community and society at large are affected by the way an enterprise functions. Hence, a business enterprise has to be socially very responsive so that a social balance may be struck between the opposing interests of these groups. Further, companies, which have huge resources at their disposal, have a moral responsibility to care for the society. Besides, discharge of social responsibilities will be in the company's own interest, because it will help build up good rapport with the society and Government and improve employee morale and industrial relations. However, there are also arguments against the social involvement of business. It will affect the financial health of companies, it may lead to attempt to dominate the community's affairs, the costs of social involvement may be passed on to the consumers by price increase, for many companies it is a tax saving gimmick, so goes the arguments. A social audit enables the public as well as the company to evaluate the social performance of the company. The "social audit - much like the financial audit - is an identification and examination of the activities of the firm in order to assess, evaluate, measure and report their impact on the immediate social environment." There is no single universally agreed upon method of social auditing. Some of the important methods of social audit developed by different people or organisations include social process audit, financial statement format audit, macro-micro social indicator audit, constituency group audit, partial social audit, comprehensive audit, and corporate rating approach.
1. What do you mean by social responsibility of a business? 2. How can you evaluate the social responsibilities of business in Indian economy? 3. What do you mean by social audit? Why it is compulsory? 4. Explain the benefits and limitations of social responsibilities?
423
1. Cherrunilam, Francis (2003), Business Environment, New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Private Limited. 2.
Glueck, William (1980), Business Policy and Strategic Management, Auckland: McGraw-Hill International Book Company. 3. Paul, Srivastava, Strategic Management, Cinicinnati:South-Western Publishing Conmpany. 4.
Fred Luthans, Organisational Behaviour (8 th ed.), Irvin/Tata McGraw Hill. 5. Stephen P. Robbins, Organisational Behaviour (9th ed.), Prentice Hall India. 424
CONTROLLING OBJECTIVE: The objective of the chapter is to give awareness to the students about the controlling process and its techniques.
14.1
Introduction 14.2
Definition 14.3
Controlling and Other Functions 14.4
Importance of Control 14.5
Steps in Controlling 14.6
Behavioural Implications of Control 14.7
Control and Organisational Factors 14.8
Overcoming Behavioural Problems 14.9
Controlling and Management by Exception 14.10 Scope of Control 14.11 Summary 14.12 Self-Test Questions 14.13 Suggested Readings
All organisations, business or non-business, face the necessity of coping with, problems of control. Like other managerial functions, the need for control arises to maximise the use of scarce resources and to achieve purposeful behaviour of organisation members. In the planning stage, managers decide how, the resources would be utilised to achieve organisational objectives; at the controlling stage; managers try to visualise whether resources are utilised in the same way as planned. Thus control completes the whole sequence of management process. COURSE: MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR COURSE CODE: MC-101 AUTHOR: SURINDER SINGH LESSON: 14
VETTER: DR. KARAM PAL 425
14.2 DEFINITION Control is any process that guides activity towards some predetermined goals. Thus control can be applied in any field such as price control, distribution control, pollution control, etc. However, control as an element of management process can be defined as the process of analysing whether actions are being taken as planned and taking corrective actions to make these to conform to planning. Thus control process tries to find out deviations between planned performance and actual performance and to suggest corrective actions wherever these are needed. For example, Terry has defined control as follows: “Controlling is determining what is being accomplished, that is evaluating the performance and, if necessary, applying corrected measures so that the performance takes place according to plan.” Based on the definition of control, its following features can be identified:
Control is forward looking because one can control future happenings and not the past. However, on control process always the past performance is measured because no one can measure the outcome of a happening which has not occurred. In the light of these measurements, managers suggest corrective actions for future period. 2. Control is both an executive process and, from the point of view of the organisations of the system, a result. As an executive process, each manager has to perform control function in the organisation. It is true that according to the level of a manager in the organisation, the nature, scope, and limit of his control function may be different as compared to a manager at other level. The word control is also preceded by an adjective to designate a control problem, such as, quality control, inventory control, production control, or even administrative control. In fact, it is administrative control, which constitutes the most comprehensive control concept. All other types of control may be subsumed under it.
Control is a continuous process. Though managerial control enables the manager to exercise control at the point of action, it follows a definite pattern and timetable, month after month and year after year on-a 426
continuous basis. 4. A control system is a coordinated-integrated system. This emphasises that, although data collected for one purpose may differ from those with another purpose, these data should be reconciled with one another. In a sense, control system is a single system, but it is more accurate to think of it as a set of interlocking sub-systems. 14.3 CONTROLLING AND OTHER FUNCTIONS Control is closely related with other functions of management because control may be affected by other functions and may affect other functions too. Often it is said planning is the basis, action is the essence, delegation is the key, and information is the guide for control. This reflects how control is closely related with other functions of management. In fact, managing process is an integrated system and all managerial functions are interrelated and interdependent. When control exists in the organisation, people know: what targets they are striving for, how they are doing in relation to the targets, and what changes are needed to keep their performance at a satisfactory level. The relationship of control with major managerial functions can be described as follows:
provides the entire spectrum on which control function is based. In fact, these two terms are often used interchangeably in the designation of the department, which carries production planning, scheduling, and routing. It emphasises that there is a plan, which directs the behaviour and activities in the organisation. Control measures these behaviour and activities and suggests measures to remove deviation, if any. Control further implies the existence of certain goals and standards. The planning process provides these goals. Control is the result of particular plans, goals, or policies. Thus, planning offers and affects control. Thus, there is a reciprocal relationship between planning and control, as presented in Figure 14.1.
Planning Action
Controlling 427
Figure 14.1: Planning and controlling relationships
Thus various elements of planning provide what is intended and expected and the means by which the goals are achieved. They provide a means for reporting back the progress made against the goals, and a general framework for new decisions and actions in an integrated pattern. Properly conceived plan become important elements in implementing effective control.
taken to correct the deviation that may be found between standards and actual results. The whole exercise of managerial process is taken to arrive at organisational objectives set by the planning process. For this purpose, actions and further actions are necessary; each time there may be correction and change in the actions depending upon the information provided by control procedure. Though it is not necessary that each time a corrective action is taken but control ensures the desirability of a particular action. This is important for organisational effectiveness. Thus, in a real sense, control means action to correct a condition found to be in error or action to prevent such a condition from arising and is never achieved without having action as an essential step. 3. Delegation as the Key: Delegation is the key for control to take place because control action can be taken only by the managers who are responsible for performance but who have authority to get the things done. A manager in the organisation gets authority through delegation and red legation. It does not make sense to make someone responsible for achieving results without delegating him adequate authority. In the absence of adequate authority, a manager is unlikely to take effective steps
428
for correcting the various deviations located in the process of analysis. Taking of corrective actions may be seen in the context of controllability of a factor effecting the deviation or non-achievement of organisational objectives. Some of these factors are controllable and some are uncontrollable. A controllable factor is one, which can be controlled by an executive action, while the uncontrollable factors lie outside his jurisdiction. A manager's action is likely to be more effective if more factors are controllable by him. He can have better controllability if he has been authorised to take decisions on various matters concerning him and affecting his action. Tile best policy of delegation is the matching of responsibility and authority. It suggests that a manager must have corresponding authority as compared to his responsibility. He has to control the operations, which are exercised by taking action, and action may be taken within the limit of the authority. So the only person who can directly control activities is the one who is directly responsible for them. This is the basic principle for effective organisations. 4. Information as the Guide: Control action is guided by adequate information from beginning to the end. Management information and management control systems are closely interrelated; the information system is designed on the basis of control system. Every manager in the organisation must have adequate information about his performance, standards, and how he is contributing to the achievement of organisational objectives. There must be a system of information tailored to the specific management needs at every level, both in terms of adequacy and timeliness. Control system ensures that every manager gets adequate information. The criterion for adequacy of information for a manager is his responsibility and authority that is in the context of his responsibility and authority, what type of information a manager needs. This can be determined on the basis of careful analysis of the manager's functions. If the manager is not using any information for taking certain action, the information may be meant for informing him only and not falling within
429
his information requirement. Thus, an effective control system ensures the flow of the information that is required by an executive, nothing more or less. There is another aspect of information for control and other function, that is, the timeliness of information. Ideally speaking, the manager should be supplied the information when he needs it for taking action. For correcting the deviation, timely action is required by the manager concerned. For this purpose, he must have the information at proper time and covering the functioning of a period, which is subject to control. The control system functions effectively on the basis of the information, which is supplied in the organisation. However, the information is used as a guide and on this basis, a manager what action can be taken.
Organisations try to achieve their objectives through various actions. From this point of view, all the objectives lead to the achievement of organisational objectives. However, the organisations must also monitor whether they are achieving their objectives or-not. Thus control is an integrated action of an organisation or manager. It offers help in the following directions: 1. Adjustments in Operations: A control system acts as an adjustment in organisational operations. Every organisation has certain objectives to achieve which becomes the basis for control. It is not only sufficient to have objectives but also to ensure that these objectives are being achieved by various functions. Control provides this clue by finding out whether plans are being observed and suitable progress towards the objectives is being made, and acting, if necessary, to correct any-deviation. This may result into taking actions more suitable for the achievement of organisational objectives.
need for control. For organisational functioning, managers set certain policies and other planning elements, which later become the basis and reason for control. They become basis in the sense that organisational performance is reviewed in these lights. They also become the reason for
430
control because through these, an organisation tries that its various individuals adhere to such framework. In this process, the organisation and its management can verify the quality of various policies.
Download 1.62 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling