Introduction youth and childhood
Tone: the writer’s or speaker’s attitude toward a subject. Ultimate paralysis
Download 59.76 Kb.
|
Ezra Pound
- Bu sahifa navigatsiya:
- Understatement
Tone: the writer’s or speaker’s attitude toward a subject.
Ultimate paralysis describes an individual or group process when overanalyzing or overthinking a situation can cause forward motion or decision-making to become "paralyzed", meaning that no solution or course of action is decided upon within a natural time frame. Understatement: a type of verbal IRONY in which something is purposely represented as being far less important than it actually is; also called meiosis. REFERENCES Aldington, R., 1919. Images of War: a book of poems. London: Beaumont Press, Page (30) Anderson, Judith H. The Growth of a Personal Voice. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1976. Beasley, R., 2007. Theorists of Modernist Poetry: T.S. Eliot, T. E. Hulme, Ezra Pound. London and New York: Routledge, Page (39). Brinkman, B., 2009. Making Modern ‘Poetry’: Format, Genre and the Invention of Imagism(e). Journal of Modern Literature, 32 (2), pp. 20–40. Childs, P. and Fowler, R., 2006. The Routledge Dictionary of Literary Terms. London and New York: Routledge, Page (118). Cullen, Patrick. Infernal Triad. Princeton University Press, 1974. Crampton, Davis, Walter R., and Richard A. Lanham. Sidney's Arcadia. Yale Studies in English, Vol. 158. Haven: Yale University Press, 1965. Dodge, R. E. Neil, ed. The Complete Poetical Works Spenser. The Cambridge Edltion of the Poets. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1936. Fowler, Alastair. Edmund Spenser. Harlow: Longman Group Ltd., 1977. Georgia R. The Condition of Creatures. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1974. Gross, Kenneth. Spenserian Poetics- Idolatry, Iconoclasm and Magic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985. 42 Kermode, Frank. Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne- The Renaissance Essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971. Kermode, Frank. The Faerie Queene, I and V. Ed. Kermode, Frank. Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne- Renaissance Essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971. King, Andrew. The Faerie Queene and Middle English Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Korg, J., 2003. ‘Imagism’, in: Roberts, N. (ed.) A Companion to Twentieth-Century Poetry. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Page (129). Lewis, C.S. Spenser´s Images of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967. 66. Lewis, C.S. Spenser´s Images of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967. Waters Bennett, Josephine. The Evolution of The Faerie Queene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1942. Lowell, A., 1917. Tendencies in Modern American Poetry. New York: The Macmillan Company, Pages (236, 240, 244). Macgowan, C., 2004. Twentieth-Century American Poetry. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing, Page (176). Mikics, D., 2007. A New Handbook of Literary Terms. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, Page (140). Milne, I. M., 2000. Persoon, J. and Watson, R. R., 2009. British Poetry, 1900 to the Present. New York: Facts On File, Inc., Pages (6, 235). Poetry for Students. Volume 9. New York: Gale Group, Page (257). Rose, Mark. Spenser´s Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975. Snodgrass, M. E., 2000. American Poets of the 20th century. Lincoln, Nebraska: Cliffs Notes, Inc., Pages (32, 60) Spens, Janet. Spenser's Faerie Queene: An Interpretation. 1934; rpt. New York: Russell and Russell, 1967. Spenser, Edmund. The Faerie Queene, Book One. London: The MacMillan Company, 1903. I.vii.9. All subsequent quotations are from this edition 1 Cullen, Patrick. Infernal Triad. Princeton University Press, 1974. Crampton, Davis, Walter R., and Richard A. Lanham. Sidney's Arcadia. Yale Studies in English, Vol. 158. Haven: Yale University Press, 1965. 2 Dodge, R. E. Neil, ed. The Complete Poetical Works Spenser. The Cambridge Edltion of the Poets. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1936. 3 Fowler, Alastair. Edmund Spenser. Harlow: Longman Group Ltd., 1977. 4 Georgia R. The Condition of Creatures. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1974. 5 Gross, Kenneth. Spenserian Poetics- Idolatry, Iconoclasm and Magic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985. 42 6 Kermode, Frank. Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne- The Renaissance Essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971. 7 Kermode, Frank. The Faerie Queene, I and V. Ed. Kermode, Frank. Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne- Renaissance Essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971. 8 Lewis, C.S. Spenser´s Images of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967. 66. 9 Lewis, C.S. Spenser´s Images of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967. Waters Bennett, Josephine. The Evolution of The Faerie Queene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1942. 10 Lowell, A., 1917. Tendencies in Modern American Poetry. New York: The Macmillan Company, Pages (236, 240, 244). 11 Poetry for Students. Volume 9. New York: Gale Group, Page (257). 12 Macgowan, C., 2004. Twentieth-Century American Poetry. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing, Page (176). 13 Rose, Mark. Spenser´s Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975. 14Snodgrass, M. E., 2000. American Poets of the 20th century. Lincoln, Nebraska: Cliffs Notes, Inc., Pages (32, 60) 15 Spens, Janet. Spenser's Faerie Queene: An Interpretation. 1934; rpt. New York: Russell and Russell, 1967. 16 Spenser, Edmund. The Faerie Queene, Book One. London: The MacMillan Company, 1903. I.vii.9. All subsequent quotations are from this edition. Download 59.76 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling