Leonid Zhmud The Origin of the History of Science in Classical Antiquity
part of professional education, though any original contribution to this science
Download 1.41 Mb. Pdf ko'rish
|
The Origin of the History of Science in
part of professional education, though any original contribution to this science remained exceptionally rare. The level of mathematical knowledge in this philosophical community and the scientific interests of its members could vary considerably: the ‘theurgist’ Iamblichus with his arithmology was unlike the 38 Interestingly, Archytas’ solution to the problem of doubling the cube is found in the mediaeval Arabic encyclopedia compiled by the Banu Musa brothers. It is, however, attributed to Menelaus; Eudemus and Archytas are not named (Knorr. TS, 101ff.). 39 Even if the History of Astronomy contained some observational and computational data drawn from the early astronomers (Meton, Euctemon, Eudoxus, Callippus, etc.), they were already incorporated in the astronomical tradition and, accordingly, were not particularly important. 40 Neugebauer. HAMA II, 748ff., 767f. Euclid’s Phaenomena and Autolycus’ On the Rotating Sphere are considered in book VI of Pappus’ Collectio, but unlike Eudemus he shows little interest in purely historical matters (cf. above, 173 n. 28, 190). Chapter 7: The history of astronomy 238 sober Eutocius, the commentator of difficult works by Apollonius, Archi- medes, and Ptolemy. Yet in spite of their individual differences, all of these people regarded themselves as the heirs of a tradition going back to Pythagoras, Plato, and Aristotle, a tradition in which mathematics was an integral part. This community’s interest in Eudemus’ historical works, even if at times limited and superficial, contrasts with the almost total indifference that Greek mathema- ticians and astronomers showed toward them. This fact apparently confirms our preliminary conclusion: the historical view of science turned out to be un- claimed by ancient scientists themselves. 2. Thales and Anaximander Having outlined the available material from the History of Astronomy and the fate of the book, let us now have a closer look at its contents and structure. As follows from the fragments and testimonies, Eudemus’ book mentioned Tha- les, Anaximander, Anaximenes (?), 41 Anaxagoras, the Pythagoreans, Oenopi- des, Meton, Euctemon, Eudoxus, Callippus, Polemarchus, and probably Me- naechmus. This list is nearly half as long as the one known from the History of Geometry and, naturally, contains only some of the names that must have fig- ured in the original text. In comparison with the History of Astronomy, the as- tronomical division of Physiko¯n doxai omits such astronomers as Meton, Euc- temon, Eudoxus etc., 42 but refers to about twenty other physicists, apart from those found in Eudemus. 43 Thus, while Eudemus dealt with those who made discoveries in mathematical astronomy, Theophrastus registered the opinions of physicists as related to astronomy as a whole. One cannot help noting that Eudemus’ list falls into two roughly equal parts: from Thales through Anaxagoras, it comprises the same physicists as in Theophrastus; starting with Oenopides, they are followed by the mathematical astronomers. Incomplete as our data inevitably remain, this correlation is not purely by chance: it reflects the actual course of the development of Greek as- tronomy. Oenopides was not, of course, the first to study astronomy ‘for its own sake’ 44 rather than within the framework of a general cosmological theory, as did Anaximander and Anaxagoras before him and Democritus and Philolaus after him. It is very likely, however, that Oenopides was the author of the first special treatise on mathematical astronomy that gave impetus to the develop- 41 See below, 255f. 42 Eudoxus’ students were excluded for chronological reasons. The reference to Eu- doxus and Aratus in Aëtius ( Dox., 347.21f.) is a later addition; cf. below, 295f. 43 Xenophanes, Pythagoras, Alcmaeon, Hecataeus, Parmenides, Heraclitus, Empe- docles, Melissus, Archelaus, Ion of Chios, Leucippus, Democritus, Antiphon, Phi- lolaus, Diogenes, Ecphantus, Hicetas, Metrodorus, and Plato. 44 Cf. already Cleostratus of Tenedos ( DK 6). 2. Thales and Anaximander 239 ment of this branch of science and contributed to the further divergence of physics and mathematics (7.5). In the Download 1.41 Mb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling