Microteaching-1 M. A. in Tesol
Download 150.83 Kb. Pdf ko'rish
|
Self Reflection Report On Microteaching
What I Did
I started the class with warm up activity. Entering the class, I exchanged greetings with the students. Then I set a lesson related scene asking questions to the students on their activities before the class and activities on the previous day. I wrote the sentences uttered by the students on the board and asked them to relate time to the sentences. They successfully answered and I declared the topic of the day. Then I put the students into several pairs and engaged them in identifying tenses of the sentences in in given situation mentioned in the handout. I also instructed them to discuss the reasons. I elicited and discussed and provided feedback when they finished their discussion. And then I engaged them in an exercise which dealt with fill in the gaps using clues on the basis of the tenses we discussed. I elicited from the students when they completed and provided feedback. Finally, I thanked all the students and I finished my class inviting the next teacher. For the class, I used Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Approach. I conducted the class in target language (English) and when any student failed to understand any point or instruction, I clarified it by judicious use of L1 (Bengali). Since the students were from elementary level, I applied scaffolding and Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) theory of Lev Vygotsky. Cooperative learning exercises were set to develop the less competent students with help from more skillful peers - within the ZPD. Students learnt a lot from their peers while working in Narottam pairs. Apart from this, I provided them appropriate assistance which boosted the students enough to achieve the task. In my session, the Natural Order Hypothesis of Krashen was also followed. Language concepts that are relatively easy for learners to acquire were introduced first in the class and then scaffolding was used to introduce more difficult concepts. Apart from this, Krashen’s Input Hypothesis (i+ 1) was applied in my session to ensure comprehensible input. Exercises and materials were set one step beyond the learner’s current language ability, in order to allow learners to continue to progress with their language development. My goal was to make learners able to communicate effectively. Comprehensible input was provided as much as possible since the learners were not exposed to the TL outside the classroom. That is why, I created a more effective opportunity for language acquisition of the students. Download 150.83 Kb. Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
Ma'lumotlar bazasi mualliflik huquqi bilan himoyalangan ©fayllar.org 2024
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling
ma'muriyatiga murojaat qiling